A Semi-Quantitative\nApproach to Nontarget Compositional\nAnalysis of Complex Samples

Nontarget analysis (NTA) by liquid chromatography coupled\nto high-resolution\nmass spectrometry improves the capacity to comprehend the molecular\ncomposition of complex mixtures compared to targeted analysis techniques.\nHowever, the detection of unknown compounds means that quantification\nin NTA is challenging. This study proposes a new semi-quantitative\nmethodology for use in the NTA of organic aerosol. Quantification\nof unknowns is achieved using the average ionization efficiency of\nmultiple quantification standards which elute within the same retention\ntime window as the unknown analytes. In total, 110 authentic standards\nconstructed 25 retention time windows for the quantification of oxygenated\n(CHO) and organonitrogen (CHON) species. The method was validated\non extracts of biomass burning organic aerosol (BBOA) and compared\nto quantification with authentic standards and had an average prediction\nerror of 1.52 times. Furthermore, 70% of concentrations were estimated\nwithin a factor of 2 (prediction errors between 0.5 and 2 times) from\nthe authentic standard quantification. The semi-quantification method\nalso showed good agreement for the quantification of CHO compounds\ncompared to predictive ionization efficiency-based methods, whereas\nfor CHON species, the prediction error of the semi-quantification\nmethod (1.63) was significantly lower than the predictive ionization\nefficiency approach (14.94). Application to BBOA for the derivation\nof relative abundances of CHO and CHON species showed that using \npeak area underestimated the relative abundance of CHO by 19% and\noverestimated that of CHON by 11% compared to the semi-quantification\nmethod. These differences could lead to significant misinterpretations\nof source apportionment in complex samples, highlighting the need\nto account for ionization differences in NTA approaches.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2024-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.4c00819.s002
Primary Topic
Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Semi-Quantitative\nApproach to Nontarget Compositional\nAnalysis of Complex Samples

Figshare
Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
article

A Semi-Quantitative\nApproach to Nontarget Compositional\nAnalysis of Complex Samples

article en

Abstract

Nontarget analysis (NTA) by liquid chromatography coupled\nto high-resolution\nmass spectrometry improves the capacity to comprehend the molecular\ncomposition of complex mixtures compared to targeted analysis techniques.\nHowever, the detection of unknown compounds means that quantification\nin NTA is challenging. This study proposes a new semi-quantitative\nmethodology for use in the NTA of organic aerosol. Quantification\nof unknowns is achieved using the average ionization efficiency of\nmultiple quantification standards which elute within the same retention\ntime window as the unknown analytes. In total, 110 authentic standards\nconstructed 25 retention time windows for the quantification of oxygenated\n(CHO) and organonitrogen (CHON) species. The method was validated\non extracts of biomass burning organic aerosol (BBOA) and compared\nto quantification with authentic standards and had an average prediction\nerror of 1.52 times. Furthermore, 70% of concentrations were estimated\nwithin a factor of 2 (prediction errors between 0.5 and 2 times) from\nthe authentic standard quantification. The semi-quantification method\nalso showed good agreement for the quantification of CHO compounds\ncompared to predictive ionization efficiency-based methods, whereas\nfor CHON species, the prediction error of the semi-quantification\nmethod (1.63) was significantly lower than the predictive ionization\nefficiency approach (14.94). Application to BBOA for the derivation\nof relative abundances of CHO and CHON species showed that using \npeak area underestimated the relative abundance of CHO by 19% and\noverestimated that of CHON by 11% compared to the semi-quantification\nmethod. These differences could lead to significant misinterpretations\nof source apportionment in complex samples, highlighting the need\nto account for ionization differences in NTA approaches.

Figshare
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.