Creating Benchmarks\nfor Lithium Clusters and Using\nThem for Testing and Validation

Metal clusters often have a variety of possible structures,\nand\nthey are calculated by a wide range of methods; however, fully converged\nbenchmarks on the energy differences of structures and spin states\nthat could be used to test or validate these methods are rare or nonexistent.\nSmall lithium clusters are good candidates for such benchmarks to\ntest different methods against well-converged relative energetics\nfor qualitatively different structures because they have a small number\nof electrons. The present study provides fully converged benchmarks\nfor Li<sub>4</sub> and Li<sub>5</sub> clusters and uses them to test\na diverse group of approximation methods. To create a dataset of well-converged\nsingle-point energies for Li<sub>4</sub> and Li<sub>5</sub>, stationary\nstructures were optimized by Kohn–Sham density functional theory\n(KS-DFT) and then single-point energy calculations at these structures\nwere carried out by two quite different beyond-CCSD(T) methods. To\ntest other methods single-point energy calculations at these structures\nwere carried out by KS-DFT, Mo̷ller–Plesset (MP) theory,\ncoupled cluster (CC) theory, five composite methods (Gaussian-4, the\nWuhan–Minnesota (WM) composite method, and the W2X, W3X, and\nW3X-L composite methods of Radom and co-workers), multiconfiguration\npair-density functional theory (MC-PDFT), complete active space second-order\nperturbation theory (CASPT2), and <i>n</i>-electron valence\nstate second-order perturbation theory (NEVPT2). Our results show\nthat rhomboid and trigonal bipyramid (TBP) geometries are the most\nstable structures for Li<sub>4</sub> and Li<sub>5</sub>, respectively.\nUsing the W3X-L method to obtain our best estimates, the mean unsigned\ndeviations were calculated for other methods for several structures\nand spin states of both Li<sub>4</sub> and Li<sub>5</sub>. Binding\nenergies and <i>M</i> diagnostics were calculated for all\nstructures. The data in this paper are valuable for assessing the\nreliability of current electronic structure theories and also developing\nnew density functionals and machine learned models.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2024-11-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.4c01224.s001
Primary Topic
Inorganic Chemistry and Materials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Creating Benchmarks\nfor Lithium Clusters and Using\nThem for Testing and Validation

Figshare
Inorganic Chemistry and Materials
article

Creating Benchmarks\nfor Lithium Clusters and Using\nThem for Testing and Validation

article en

Abstract

Metal clusters often have a variety of possible structures,\nand\nthey are calculated by a wide range of methods; however, fully converged\nbenchmarks on the energy differences of structures and spin states\nthat could be used to test or validate these methods are rare or nonexistent.\nSmall lithium clusters are good candidates for such benchmarks to\ntest different methods against well-converged relative energetics\nfor qualitatively different structures because they have a small number\nof electrons. The present study provides fully converged benchmarks\nfor Li<sub>4</sub> and Li<sub>5</sub> clusters and uses them to test\na diverse group of approximation methods. To create a dataset of well-converged\nsingle-point energies for Li<sub>4</sub> and Li<sub>5</sub>, stationary\nstructures were optimized by Kohn–Sham density functional theory\n(KS-DFT) and then single-point energy calculations at these structures\nwere carried out by two quite different beyond-CCSD(T) methods. To\ntest other methods single-point energy calculations at these structures\nwere carried out by KS-DFT, Mo̷ller–Plesset (MP) theory,\ncoupled cluster (CC) theory, five composite methods (Gaussian-4, the\nWuhan–Minnesota (WM) composite method, and the W2X, W3X, and\nW3X-L composite methods of Radom and co-workers), multiconfiguration\npair-density functional theory (MC-PDFT), complete active space second-order\nperturbation theory (CASPT2), and <i>n</i>-electron valence\nstate second-order perturbation theory (NEVPT2). Our results show\nthat rhomboid and trigonal bipyramid (TBP) geometries are the most\nstable structures for Li<sub>4</sub> and Li<sub>5</sub>, respectively.\nUsing the W3X-L method to obtain our best estimates, the mean unsigned\ndeviations were calculated for other methods for several structures\nand spin states of both Li<sub>4</sub> and Li<sub>5</sub>. Binding\nenergies and <i>M</i> diagnostics were calculated for all\nstructures. The data in this paper are valuable for assessing the\nreliability of current electronic structure theories and also developing\nnew density functionals and machine learned models.

Figshare
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Inorganic Chemistry and Materials
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.