The Investment Screening Regulation and its screening ground "security or public order": how the WTO law understanding undermines the Regulation's objectives

The EU adopted Regulation 2019/452 (Regulation) as part of a more robust Common commercial policy to strengthen and defend its interests in a shifting global order. More concretely, the Regulation has two objectives: protecting domestic assets from harmful foreign investor interests, and equipping the EU with leverage to achieve more favourable treatment of EU investors abroad. Therefore, the Regulation provides Member States with an option to adopt foreign direct investment (FDI) screening mechanisms on the grounds of "security or public order". However, the Regulation misses its objectives. The Regulation's vague screening ground "security or public order" must be interpreted in accordance with WTO law. A detailed analysis finds that the relevant WTO notions of essential security interests and public order are rather narrow. The Regulation's screening ground "security or public order" therefore only allows the screening of a few, high-profile cases of FDI. Such a narrow scope undermines the Regulation's objectives.

Publication Details

Journal
Graduate Institute Geneva Institutional Repository (Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies)
Published
2025-06-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.71609/iheid-nxj6-f590
Primary Topic
World Trade Organization Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Investment Screening Regulation and its screening ground "security or public order": how the WTO law understanding undermines the Regulation's objectives

Graduate Institute Geneva Institutional Repository (Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies)
World Trade Organization Law
article

The Investment Screening Regulation and its screening ground "security or public order": how the WTO law understanding undermines the Regulation's objectives

article en

Abstract

The EU adopted Regulation 2019/452 (Regulation) as part of a more robust Common commercial policy to strengthen and defend its interests in a shifting global order. More concretely, the Regulation has two objectives: protecting domestic assets from harmful foreign investor interests, and equipping the EU with leverage to achieve more favourable treatment of EU investors abroad. Therefore, the Regulation provides Member States with an option to adopt foreign direct investment (FDI) screening mechanisms on the grounds of "security or public order". However, the Regulation misses its objectives. The Regulation's vague screening ground "security or public order" must be interpreted in accordance with WTO law. A detailed analysis finds that the relevant WTO notions of essential security interests and public order are rather narrow. The Regulation's screening ground "security or public order" therefore only allows the screening of a few, high-profile cases of FDI. Such a narrow scope undermines the Regulation's objectives.

Graduate Institute Geneva Institutional Repository (Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies)
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
World Trade Organization Law
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Investment Screening Regulation and its screening ground "security or public order": how the WTO law understanding undermines the Regulation's objectives · Graduate Institute Geneva Institutional Repository (Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS