The Right to a Healthy Environment and Transnational Corporate Accountability: Bridging Gaps between Global North and Global South Perspectives

The 2022 UN General Assembly’s recognition of the right to a clean, healthy, and sustainable environment marked a significant step in advancing environmental protection through human rights mechanisms. States in the Global South have led the way in conceptualising the right to a healthy environment in a holistic and broad manner which has allowed for enhanced efforts at corporate environmental and climate accountability. However, this approach has been largely absent from Global North frameworks, which has focused instead on corporate human rights due diligence and the establishment of normative frameworks which entrench certain neoliberal conceptions about the divide between state and corporate responsibility. This article explores the potential of the right to a healthy environment to enhance corporate accountability for environmental harm, particularly in the context of the UNGA resolution recognising the right, emerging international climate litigation and the development of mandatory human rights due diligence legislation. Divided into four parts, this article first traces the historical development of the right to a healthy environment, examining its intersection with the business and human rights movement. It argues that a gap exists between the right to a healthy environment and corporate accountability, particularly given the Global South’s leadership in interpreting the right in this context. It then analyses the 2022 UN resolution and subsequent UN reports that have further developed this right, highlighting innovative approaches to corporate responsibility. Finally, the article considers future pathways for applying the right to hold non-state actors accountable for environmental harm, offering insights into how this right may influence corporate behaviour through litigation and policy mechanisms.

Publication Details

Journal
Diamond OA Journals at Cambridge
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.60866/cam.128
Primary Topic
Environmental law and policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Right to a Healthy Environment and Transnational Corporate Accountability: Bridging Gaps between Global North and Global South Perspectives

Diamond OA Journals at Cambridge
Environmental law and policy
article

The Right to a Healthy Environment and Transnational Corporate Accountability: Bridging Gaps between Global North and Global South Perspectives

article en

Abstract

The 2022 UN General Assembly’s recognition of the right to a clean, healthy, and sustainable environment marked a significant step in advancing environmental protection through human rights mechanisms. States in the Global South have led the way in conceptualising the right to a healthy environment in a holistic and broad manner which has allowed for enhanced efforts at corporate environmental and climate accountability. However, this approach has been largely absent from Global North frameworks, which has focused instead on corporate human rights due diligence and the establishment of normative frameworks which entrench certain neoliberal conceptions about the divide between state and corporate responsibility. This article explores the potential of the right to a healthy environment to enhance corporate accountability for environmental harm, particularly in the context of the UNGA resolution recognising the right, emerging international climate litigation and the development of mandatory human rights due diligence legislation. Divided into four parts, this article first traces the historical development of the right to a healthy environment, examining its intersection with the business and human rights movement. It argues that a gap exists between the right to a healthy environment and corporate accountability, particularly given the Global South’s leadership in interpreting the right in this context. It then analyses the 2022 UN resolution and subsequent UN reports that have further developed this right, highlighting innovative approaches to corporate responsibility. Finally, the article considers future pathways for applying the right to hold non-state actors accountable for environmental harm, offering insights into how this right may influence corporate behaviour through litigation and policy mechanisms.

Diamond OA Journals at Cambridge
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Environmental law and policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.