Awarding interest in investment arbitration

Judging by the last few years trends, international investment arbitral practice and jurisprudence has evolved quite dramatically with respect to awarding interest from a time when its practice was unreflective of commercial realities. This seems to be particularly true with the recent trend in regards to the award of compound versus simple interest, even though no uniform approach on the issue has yet emerged. The underlying premise of this paper is that, in international arbitration, awards of interest can undoubtedly be as relevant as the principal amount owed for the loss caused. In this light, we submit that awarding compound instead of simple interest would streamline the current practice, which still suffers from a major unpredictability issues that are undesired for the system. Furthermore, the adoption of compounding interest instead of simple interest would enhance the respect for the principle of full compensation. Indeed, it would be realistic, for in conformity with the current state of affairs of modern financial transactions where compound interest is the norm. In this thesis, we seek to explore the mechanics of awarding interest in investment arbitration. In doing so, we will firstly go through a general overview of some of the most pertinent aspects that call for attention in this subject i.e. what are the main reasons for awarding interest. We will thereafter look at issues such as the main legal sources that allow for the award of interest and the way they interplay, if at all. Secondly, we will focus on the interest rate and the different approaches that arbitral tribunals use to choose the appropriate one to be applied to a given case. Lastly, we will endeavor to further arguments in favor of the award of compound interest in international arbitration. In doing so, scholarly literature vehemently advocating on the matter of award of compound versus simple interest, the review of legal sources, and last but not least past and recent investment arbitration case law and other relevant international jurisprudential sources, will be taken into account.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Graduate Institute Geneva Institutional Repository (Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies)
Published
2025-05-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.71609/iheid-70hv-tm45
Primary Topic
International Arbitration and Investment Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Awarding interest in investment arbitration

Graduate Institute Geneva Institutional Repository (Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies)
International Arbitration and Investment Law
article

Awarding interest in investment arbitration

article en

Abstract

Judging by the last few years trends, international investment arbitral practice and jurisprudence has evolved quite dramatically with respect to awarding interest from a time when its practice was unreflective of commercial realities. This seems to be particularly true with the recent trend in regards to the award of compound versus simple interest, even though no uniform approach on the issue has yet emerged. The underlying premise of this paper is that, in international arbitration, awards of interest can undoubtedly be as relevant as the principal amount owed for the loss caused. In this light, we submit that awarding compound instead of simple interest would streamline the current practice, which still suffers from a major unpredictability issues that are undesired for the system. Furthermore, the adoption of compounding interest instead of simple interest would enhance the respect for the principle of full compensation. Indeed, it would be realistic, for in conformity with the current state of affairs of modern financial transactions where compound interest is the norm. In this thesis, we seek to explore the mechanics of awarding interest in investment arbitration. In doing so, we will firstly go through a general overview of some of the most pertinent aspects that call for attention in this subject i.e. what are the main reasons for awarding interest. We will thereafter look at issues such as the main legal sources that allow for the award of interest and the way they interplay, if at all. Secondly, we will focus on the interest rate and the different approaches that arbitral tribunals use to choose the appropriate one to be applied to a given case. Lastly, we will endeavor to further arguments in favor of the award of compound interest in international arbitration. In doing so, scholarly literature vehemently advocating on the matter of award of compound versus simple interest, the review of legal sources, and last but not least past and recent investment arbitration case law and other relevant international jurisprudential sources, will be taken into account.

Graduate Institute Geneva Institutional Repository (Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies)
Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies (CH)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
International Arbitration and Investment Law
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.