Decentralisation and WHO reform: a broader perspective

WHO) reform process, the Permanent Mission of the Federal Republic of Germany to the United Nations Office and other international organizations in Geneva organized an event to discuss "Decentralisation in WHO: Advantages and Challenges" on 21 January 2013.Three perspectives were presented on that occasion: A broader perspective by Prof Ilona Kickbusch, a regional perspective by Zsuzsanna Jakab, and a perspective of the WHO Joint Inspection Unit by Istvan Posta.These presentations are available on the WHO EURO website through the following link: http://bit.ly/UqsKjEThis working paper is a slightly revised version of the presentation given by Professsor Ilona Kickbusch.It offers an alternative approach to decentralisation.The paper argues that the greatest challenges of the WHO reform are governance challenges.In principle, WHO with its three tiers of governance is actually better placed to act in a multilevel and multi-actor world than many other international organizations.Its challenge is to set itself up to do so much better than at present through adopting principles of network governance.This is a challenge not only to the Secretariat but also to the Member States and how they govern the organization.The WHO must not only set priorities -it must apply foresight and become strategic in a new way.In order to ensure that health -in the broad sense of the WHO Constitution -is high on the global agenda WHO needs to adapt its own governance and capacities to a strategic and networked approach of work and make visible (and learn from) those experiences within the organization where this is already applied successfully.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Graduate Institute Geneva Institutional Repository (Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies)
Published
2025-06-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.71609/iheid-sdy5-e062
Primary Topic
Global Maternal and Child Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Decentralisation and WHO reform: a broader perspective

Graduate Institute Geneva Institutional Repository (Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies)
Global Maternal and Child Health
article

Decentralisation and WHO reform: a broader perspective

article en

Abstract

WHO) reform process, the Permanent Mission of the Federal Republic of Germany to the United Nations Office and other international organizations in Geneva organized an event to discuss "Decentralisation in WHO: Advantages and Challenges" on 21 January 2013.Three perspectives were presented on that occasion: A broader perspective by Prof Ilona Kickbusch, a regional perspective by Zsuzsanna Jakab, and a perspective of the WHO Joint Inspection Unit by Istvan Posta.These presentations are available on the WHO EURO website through the following link: http://bit.ly/UqsKjEThis working paper is a slightly revised version of the presentation given by Professsor Ilona Kickbusch.It offers an alternative approach to decentralisation.The paper argues that the greatest challenges of the WHO reform are governance challenges.In principle, WHO with its three tiers of governance is actually better placed to act in a multilevel and multi-actor world than many other international organizations.Its challenge is to set itself up to do so much better than at present through adopting principles of network governance.This is a challenge not only to the Secretariat but also to the Member States and how they govern the organization.The WHO must not only set priorities -it must apply foresight and become strategic in a new way.In order to ensure that health -in the broad sense of the WHO Constitution -is high on the global agenda WHO needs to adapt its own governance and capacities to a strategic and networked approach of work and make visible (and learn from) those experiences within the organization where this is already applied successfully.

Graduate Institute Geneva Institutional Repository (Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies)
Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies (CH)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Global Maternal and Child Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Decentralisation and WHO reform: a broader perspective · Graduate Institute Geneva Institutional Repository (Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS