Interaction of Different Kinds of Advance Organizer Strategies and Read-ing Comprehension Skills: Right- and Left-Brain EFL Learners Across Gender

This study investigated the effects of different kinds of advanced organizers, such as graphic, verbal, and textual organizers, on the reading comprehension of left- and right-brained Iranian EFL learners. The participants of the study were 64 female and 54 male intermediate-level EFL learners with ages ranging from 19 to 28 (M = 23) and varying degrees of brain dominance from Mohaghegh Language Institute in Tabriz, Iran. Four intact classes, one control group and three experimental groups including graphic organizer, verbal organizer, and textual organizer groups participated in this study. The design of the study was aquasi-experimental design with a pretest and a posttest. The uniformity of the EFL students was ensured using the Oxford Place-ment Test (OPT). The Alert Scale of Cognitive Style (Crane, 1989) was used to identify left- and right-brained EFL students. The research recreated the pretest and posttest in this study to assess the participants' reading comprehension before and after the intervention. The ANCOVA results demonstrated a significant impact of the use of advance organizers on the participants' reading comprehension scores. The only significant difference in reading comprehension mean scores was between participants who used graphic organizers and textual organizers; there was no sta-tistically significant difference between participants who used verbal organizers and textual or-ganizers. Students with left and right brains performed about equally well in the textual organiz-er group. Students with right-brained personalities outperformed those with left-brained person-alities in the graphic organizer group, but the reverse was true for the verbal organizer group. However, there was little difference in the reading comprehension levels between the groups. Additionally, the results demonstrated that females used advanced organizers more skillfully than males did. The results imply that various advance organizers ought to be included in L2 reading courses.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Languages and Translation
Published
2025-03-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.71755/ttlt-1201831
Primary Topic
Hemispheric Asymmetry in Neuroscience
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Interaction of Different Kinds of Advance Organizer Strategies and Read-ing Comprehension Skills: Right- and Left-Brain EFL Learners Across Gender

Journal of Languages and Translation
Hemispheric Asymmetry in Neuroscience
article

Interaction of Different Kinds of Advance Organizer Strategies and Read-ing Comprehension Skills: Right- and Left-Brain EFL Learners Across Gender

article en

Abstract

This study investigated the effects of different kinds of advanced organizers, such as graphic, verbal, and textual organizers, on the reading comprehension of left- and right-brained Iranian EFL learners. The participants of the study were 64 female and 54 male intermediate-level EFL learners with ages ranging from 19 to 28 (M = 23) and varying degrees of brain dominance from Mohaghegh Language Institute in Tabriz, Iran. Four intact classes, one control group and three experimental groups including graphic organizer, verbal organizer, and textual organizer groups participated in this study. The design of the study was aquasi-experimental design with a pretest and a posttest. The uniformity of the EFL students was ensured using the Oxford Place-ment Test (OPT). The Alert Scale of Cognitive Style (Crane, 1989) was used to identify left- and right-brained EFL students. The research recreated the pretest and posttest in this study to assess the participants' reading comprehension before and after the intervention. The ANCOVA results demonstrated a significant impact of the use of advance organizers on the participants' reading comprehension scores. The only significant difference in reading comprehension mean scores was between participants who used graphic organizers and textual organizers; there was no sta-tistically significant difference between participants who used verbal organizers and textual or-ganizers. Students with left and right brains performed about equally well in the textual organiz-er group. Students with right-brained personalities outperformed those with left-brained person-alities in the graphic organizer group, but the reverse was true for the verbal organizer group. However, there was little difference in the reading comprehension levels between the groups. Additionally, the results demonstrated that females used advanced organizers more skillfully than males did. The results imply that various advance organizers ought to be included in L2 reading courses.

Journal of Languages and Translation
Islamic Azad University, Tehran (IR), Islamic Azad University Sari Branch (IR)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Hemispheric Asymmetry in Neuroscience
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.