REDD + within the post-Kyoto climate change regime: ensuring equity without creating ‘tropical hot air’

This paper discusses strategies to make the global program for Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation and Enhancement of Forest Stocks (REDD+) an effective and equitable part of the post-Kyoto Climate Change Regime. This work submits that, in order for any global REDD+ strategy to succeed, it must be transparent in design and must also provide results-based financing that is appropriate to different developing country situations. It is further argued that the current proposals for REDD+ results-based financing either do not offer suitable incentives for countries with high forest cover and low historical rates of deforestation (thereby essentially rewarding poor past performers), or they seek to address equity concerns in a non-transparent manner that could exacerbate problems of “tropical hot air” by paying for artificial achievements.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Graduate Institute Geneva Institutional Repository (Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies)
Published
2025-04-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.71609/iheid-419b-az83
Primary Topic
Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

REDD + within the post-Kyoto climate change regime: ensuring equity without creating ‘tropical hot air’

Graduate Institute Geneva Institutional Repository (Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies)
Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
article

REDD + within the post-Kyoto climate change regime: ensuring equity without creating ‘tropical hot air’

article en

Abstract

This paper discusses strategies to make the global program for Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation and Enhancement of Forest Stocks (REDD+) an effective and equitable part of the post-Kyoto Climate Change Regime. This work submits that, in order for any global REDD+ strategy to succeed, it must be transparent in design and must also provide results-based financing that is appropriate to different developing country situations. It is further argued that the current proposals for REDD+ results-based financing either do not offer suitable incentives for countries with high forest cover and low historical rates of deforestation (thereby essentially rewarding poor past performers), or they seek to address equity concerns in a non-transparent manner that could exacerbate problems of “tropical hot air” by paying for artificial achievements.

Graduate Institute Geneva Institutional Repository (Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies)
Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies (CH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.