Distinguishing Emotion AI: Factors Shaping Perceptions Including Input Data, Emotion Data Recipients, and Identity

Emotion artificial intelligence (emotion AI), which claims to infer data subjects’ emotions, is used across a range of high-stakes con- texts in the U.S. Examining data subjects’ perceptions of emotion AI is important given the impact its use can have on their access to opportunities, among other consequences. Such inquiry requires an empirical understanding of data subjects’ attitudes about emotion AI compared to AI that does not infer emotions, and differences across potential 1) input data (e.g., facial data, speech data), and 2) recipients of its outputs (i.e., emotion data). To these ends, us- ing a contextual integrity lens, we conducted a survey (n = 742) with a representative U.S. sample, oversampling for individuals of minority groups. Results demonstrate data subjects’ attitudes toward emotion AI are significantly more negative than AI that does not detect emotion. Further, we find significant contrasts in perceptions of specific input data across gender, race, and disabil- ity status, particularly for neurodiverse individuals. We also find participants express concern with all emotion data recipients, with higher concern for their data being accessed by recipients with large power asymmetries. Based on these findings, we argue emotion AI should not be deployed without a comprehensive assessment of its implications across demographic groups, yielding implications for policymakers and developers.

Publication Details

Journal
University of Michigan Library
Published
2025-06-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7302/26062
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Distinguishing Emotion AI: Factors Shaping Perceptions Including Input Data, Emotion Data Recipients, and Identity

University of Michigan Library
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Distinguishing Emotion AI: Factors Shaping Perceptions Including Input Data, Emotion Data Recipients, and Identity

article en

Abstract

Emotion artificial intelligence (emotion AI), which claims to infer data subjects’ emotions, is used across a range of high-stakes con- texts in the U.S. Examining data subjects’ perceptions of emotion AI is important given the impact its use can have on their access to opportunities, among other consequences. Such inquiry requires an empirical understanding of data subjects’ attitudes about emotion AI compared to AI that does not infer emotions, and differences across potential 1) input data (e.g., facial data, speech data), and 2) recipients of its outputs (i.e., emotion data). To these ends, us- ing a contextual integrity lens, we conducted a survey (n = 742) with a representative U.S. sample, oversampling for individuals of minority groups. Results demonstrate data subjects’ attitudes toward emotion AI are significantly more negative than AI that does not detect emotion. Further, we find significant contrasts in perceptions of specific input data across gender, race, and disabil- ity status, particularly for neurodiverse individuals. We also find participants express concern with all emotion data recipients, with higher concern for their data being accessed by recipients with large power asymmetries. Based on these findings, we argue emotion AI should not be deployed without a comprehensive assessment of its implications across demographic groups, yielding implications for policymakers and developers.

University of Michigan Library
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.