Book forum. On Costello, Aesthetics after modernism

This remarkable book by Diarmuid Costello can be divided into a pars destruens and a pars construens. The pars destruens is an excellent critical survey of the conceptual framework underlying the trajectory of Clement Greenberg and some of his followers and/or critics. Costello’s considerations on conceptual art (weak and strong non-perceptual art) and the analysis of case studies are also particularly enlightening. Regarding the pars construens, I fully support Costello’s approach of revisiting Kant’s aesthetic reflection, demonstrating its richness and adequacy as a framework for understanding artworks across all eras - including conceptual art and the diverse landscape of contemporary artistic practices. However, I find his strategy for executing this project unconvincing. My objections center on two key points: I. The distinction between free and dependent beauty. II. Aesthetic ideas and genius.

Publication Details

Journal
IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome)
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7413/1825864712
Primary Topic
Ethics, Aesthetics, and Art
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Book forum. On Costello, Aesthetics after modernism

IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome)
Ethics, Aesthetics, and Art
article

Book forum. On Costello, Aesthetics after modernism

article en

Abstract

This remarkable book by Diarmuid Costello can be divided into a pars destruens and a pars construens. The pars destruens is an excellent critical survey of the conceptual framework underlying the trajectory of Clement Greenberg and some of his followers and/or critics. Costello’s considerations on conceptual art (weak and strong non-perceptual art) and the analysis of case studies are also particularly enlightening. Regarding the pars construens, I fully support Costello’s approach of revisiting Kant’s aesthetic reflection, demonstrating its richness and adequacy as a framework for understanding artworks across all eras - including conceptual art and the diverse landscape of contemporary artistic practices. However, I find his strategy for executing this project unconvincing. My objections center on two key points: I. The distinction between free and dependent beauty. II. Aesthetic ideas and genius.

IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Ethics, Aesthetics, and Art
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.