Additional file 7 of An updated systematic review with meta-analysis and meta-regression of the factors associated with human visceral leishmaniasis in the Americas

Additional file 7. Forest plots of socioeconomic variables associated with human visceral leishmaniasis in the Americas. Fig. S1 Forest plot for the water supply variable. Abbreviations: CS cross-sectional; LST Leishmania skin test. Superscripts:result of serological test in a study involving two diagnostic tests;results in adults;second result in a single article. The squares represent the weight of each study, whereas the diamonds represent the summary measurement of each subgroup. Reference: Non-piped water, Odds Ratio = 1. [40, 43, 48, 60, 63, 65]. Fig. S2 Forest plot for the sewage system variable. Abbreviations: CS cross-sectional; LST Leishmania skin test. Superscripts:result of serological test in a study involving two diagnostic tests;results in adults;second result in a single article. The squares represent the weight of each study, whereas the diamonds represent the summary measurement of each subgroup. Reference: Absence of sewage system, Odds Ratio = 1. [40, 48, 53, 63, 69]. Fig. S3 Forest plot for the garbage collection variable. Abbreviations: CS cross-sectional; LST Leishmania skin test. Superscripts:result of serological test in a study involving two diagnostic tests;results in adults;second result in a single article. The squares represent the weight of each study, whereas the diamonds represent the summary measurement of each subgroup. Reference: Public garbage collection, Odds Ratio = 1. [40, 42, 53, 63, 65, 67]. Fig. S4 Forest plot for the floor variable. Abbreviations: CS cross-sectional; LST Leishmania skin test. Superscripts:result of serological test in a study involving two diagnostic tests;results in adults;second result in a single article. The squares represent the weight of each study, whereas the diamonds represent the summary measurement of each subgroup. Reference: Inadequate, Odds Ratio = 1. [14, 40, 43, 48, 53, 57, 59, 60]. Fig. S5 Forest plot for the house finishing variable. Abbreviations: CS cross-sectional; LST Leishmania skin test. Superscripts:result of serological test in a study involving two diagnostic tests;results in adults;second result in a single article. The squares represent the weight of each study, whereas the diamonds represent the summary measurement of each subgroup. Reference: Inadequate, Odds Ratio = 1. [14, 37, 40, 42, 43, 48, 53, 63]. Fig. S6 Forest plot for the income variable. Abbreviations: CS cross-sectional; LST Leishmania skin test. Superscripts:result of serological test in a study involving two diagnostic tests;results in adults;second result in a single article. The squares represent the weight of each study, whereas the diamonds represent the summary measurement of each subgroup. Reference: More than 01 minimum wage, Odds Ratio = 1. [45, 59, 69]. Fig. S7 Forest plot for the variable education. Abbreviations: CS cross-sectional; LST Leishmania skin test. Superscripts:result of serological test in a study involving two diagnostic tests;results in adults;second result in a single article. The squares represent the weight of each study, whereas the diamonds represent the summary measurement of each subgroup. Reference: Some education, Odds Ratio = 1. [45, 49, 59, 66]. Fig. S8 Forest plot for the variable education. Abbreviations: CS cross-sectional; LST Leishmania skin test. Superscripts:result of serological test in a study involving two diagnostic tests;results in adults;second result in a single article. The squares represent the weight of each study, whereas the diamonds represent the summary measurement of each subgroup. Reference: Non-elementary, Odds Ratio = 1. [40, 48, 60]. Fig. S9 Forest plot for the variable number of residents per household. Abbreviations: CS cross-sectional; LST Leishmania skin test. Superscripts:result of serological test in a study involving two diagnostic tests;results in adults;second result in a single article. The squares represent the weight of each study, whereas the diamonds represent the summary measurement of each subgroup. Reference: < 4 people, Odds Ratio = 1. [14, 40, 42, 53, 59].