Additional file 1 of Comparative performance evaluation of bisulfite- and enzyme-based DNA conversion methods

Supplementary file 1. PDF file containing qBiCo standard curves and corresponding parameters. Supplementary Figure 1. qBiCo standard curves per BC run; Supplementary Figure 2. qBiCo standard curves per EC run; Supplementary Figure 3. qBiCo standard curves for BC and EC conversion of 22 10 ng gDNA samples; Supplementary Figure 4. DNA degradation assessment of sonicated samples; Supplementary Table 1. qBiCo standard curve parameters per BC conversion experiment. (Efficiency, R squared value of linear regression fit, slope and intercept); Supplementary Table 2. qBiCo standard curve parameters per EC conversion experiment. (Efficiency, R squared value of linear regression fit, slope and intercept); Supplementary Table 3. qBiCo standard curve parameters for BC and EC conversion of 22 10 ng gDNA samples. (Efficiency, R squared value of linear regression fit, slope and intercept); Supplementary Table 4. qBiCo gblock concentration (copy numbers/microliter) per run; Supplementary Table 5. Study design; Supplementary Table 6. Effect of fragmentation on enzymatic conversion performance measured by qBiCo.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.28729429
Primary Topic
Environmental Chemistry and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Additional file 1 of Comparative performance evaluation of bisulfite- and enzyme-based DNA conversion methods

Figshare
Environmental Chemistry and Analysis
article

Additional file 1 of Comparative performance evaluation of bisulfite- and enzyme-based DNA conversion methods

article en

Abstract

Supplementary file 1. PDF file containing qBiCo standard curves and corresponding parameters. Supplementary Figure 1. qBiCo standard curves per BC run; Supplementary Figure 2. qBiCo standard curves per EC run; Supplementary Figure 3. qBiCo standard curves for BC and EC conversion of 22 10 ng gDNA samples; Supplementary Figure 4. DNA degradation assessment of sonicated samples; Supplementary Table 1. qBiCo standard curve parameters per BC conversion experiment. (Efficiency, R squared value of linear regression fit, slope and intercept); Supplementary Table 2. qBiCo standard curve parameters per EC conversion experiment. (Efficiency, R squared value of linear regression fit, slope and intercept); Supplementary Table 3. qBiCo standard curve parameters for BC and EC conversion of 22 10 ng gDNA samples. (Efficiency, R squared value of linear regression fit, slope and intercept); Supplementary Table 4. qBiCo gblock concentration (copy numbers/microliter) per run; Supplementary Table 5. Study design; Supplementary Table 6. Effect of fragmentation on enzymatic conversion performance measured by qBiCo.

Figshare
Erasmus MC (NL), Maastricht University (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Environmental Chemistry and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Additional file 1 of Comparative performance evaluation of bisulfite- and enzyme-based DNA conversion methods · Figshare (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS