Additional file 1 of Comparative performance evaluation of bisulfite- and enzyme-based DNA conversion methods
Supplementary file 1. PDF file containing qBiCo standard curves and corresponding parameters. Supplementary Figure 1. qBiCo standard curves per BC run; Supplementary Figure 2. qBiCo standard curves per EC run; Supplementary Figure 3. qBiCo standard curves for BC and EC conversion of 22 10 ng gDNA samples; Supplementary Figure 4. DNA degradation assessment of sonicated samples; Supplementary Table 1. qBiCo standard curve parameters per BC conversion experiment. (Efficiency, R squared value of linear regression fit, slope and intercept); Supplementary Table 2. qBiCo standard curve parameters per EC conversion experiment. (Efficiency, R squared value of linear regression fit, slope and intercept); Supplementary Table 3. qBiCo standard curve parameters for BC and EC conversion of 22 10 ng gDNA samples. (Efficiency, R squared value of linear regression fit, slope and intercept); Supplementary Table 4. qBiCo gblock concentration (copy numbers/microliter) per run; Supplementary Table 5. Study design; Supplementary Table 6. Effect of fragmentation on enzymatic conversion performance measured by qBiCo.
Institutions
- Erasmus MC (NL)
- Maastricht University (NL)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Figshare
- Published
- 2025-01-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.28729429
- Primary Topic
- Environmental Chemistry and Analysis
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00