Revisiting the Deficit Model: The Effect of Water Science Knowledge on Policy Perceptions

Knowledge deficit research indicates that scientific knowledge typically has limited impact on policy preferences and may unknowingly impact unmeasured factors on policy success. This research examined whether water science knowledge may have unforeseen impacts that should be considered before reducing reliance on knowledge interventions. A survey of 1,011 Florida residents assessed the relationship among knowledge of scientific water topics and understanding of water tradeoffs, willingness to reconsider preferences, perceived need for water quality improvement, trust in policy information, perceived bias, and desired stakeholder involvement. Results indicate that participants’ scientific water knowledge increased understanding of the tradeoffs between policy options; however, there was a negative association between water knowledge and perceived need for water quality improvement. Results also revealed that while knowledge enhances understanding of tradeoffs and diminishes perceived scientific bias, it also correlates with decreased backing for stakeholder involvement and less openness to changing opinions.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.28427986.v1
Primary Topic
Policy Transfer and Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Revisiting the Deficit Model: The Effect of Water Science Knowledge on Policy Perceptions

Figshare
Policy Transfer and Learning
article

Revisiting the Deficit Model: The Effect of Water Science Knowledge on Policy Perceptions

article en

Abstract

Knowledge deficit research indicates that scientific knowledge typically has limited impact on policy preferences and may unknowingly impact unmeasured factors on policy success. This research examined whether water science knowledge may have unforeseen impacts that should be considered before reducing reliance on knowledge interventions. A survey of 1,011 Florida residents assessed the relationship among knowledge of scientific water topics and understanding of water tradeoffs, willingness to reconsider preferences, perceived need for water quality improvement, trust in policy information, perceived bias, and desired stakeholder involvement. Results indicate that participants’ scientific water knowledge increased understanding of the tradeoffs between policy options; however, there was a negative association between water knowledge and perceived need for water quality improvement. Results also revealed that while knowledge enhances understanding of tradeoffs and diminishes perceived scientific bias, it also correlates with decreased backing for stakeholder involvement and less openness to changing opinions.

Figshare
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Policy Transfer and Learning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.