Using wing bar patterns to identify sex in Crowned Eagles <i>Stephanoaetus coronatus</i>: A misleading field characteristic

Almost universally, raptors exhibit some degree of sexual size dimorphism, with many species also having substantial sexual dimorphism in plumage patterns. The monophyletic clade ‘booted eagles’ generally do not, except for the Crowned Eagle <i>Stephanoaetus coronatus</i>, which are believed to have sex-specific wing patterns suitable for field identification. We challenge this long-established norm of field identification of sexes of Crowned Eagles based on their wing bar patterns. Photographs of seven adult Crowned Eagles were translated to a standardised digital template to facilitate a systematic comparison. There was significant individual variation in the wing pattern of Crowned Eagles, and these did not appear to be linked to sex. Alternative explanations for the underwing patterns include plumage polymorphism and individual plumage variation. We demonstrated that Crowned Eagles cannot be reliably sexed by the number of bars on the wing and we established a foundation for ongoing investigation, especially regarding the stability of this pattern in ageing individuals.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.28740408
Primary Topic
Animal Behavior and Reproduction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Using wing bar patterns to identify sex in Crowned Eagles Stephanoaetus coronatus: A misleading field characteristic

Figshare
Animal Behavior and Reproduction
article

Using wing bar patterns to identify sex in Crowned Eagles Stephanoaetus coronatus: A misleading field characteristic

article en

Abstract

Almost universally, raptors exhibit some degree of sexual size dimorphism, with many species also having substantial sexual dimorphism in plumage patterns. The monophyletic clade ‘booted eagles’ generally do not, except for the Crowned Eagle <i>Stephanoaetus coronatus</i>, which are believed to have sex-specific wing patterns suitable for field identification. We challenge this long-established norm of field identification of sexes of Crowned Eagles based on their wing bar patterns. Photographs of seven adult Crowned Eagles were translated to a standardised digital template to facilitate a systematic comparison. There was significant individual variation in the wing pattern of Crowned Eagles, and these did not appear to be linked to sex. Alternative explanations for the underwing patterns include plumage polymorphism and individual plumage variation. We demonstrated that Crowned Eagles cannot be reliably sexed by the number of bars on the wing and we established a foundation for ongoing investigation, especially regarding the stability of this pattern in ageing individuals.

Figshare
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Animal Behavior and Reproduction
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Using wing bar patterns to identify sex in Crowned Eagles <i>Stephanoaetus coronatus</i>: A misleading field characteristic · Figshare (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS