The role of state anxiety in salience-driven distractor processing: evidence from singleton detection and feature search

Salient but irrelevant distractors automatically capture attention in singleton detection search but not in feature search, due to the different search strategies adopt by observers. While state anxiety has been associated with increased salience-driven capture, it remains unclear whether such effects extend to feature search, which relies more on top-down control. The present study addressed this question using an eye-tracking technique, combining the threat of shock with the singleton detection and feature search tasks. Participants were instructed to execute speeded saccades to the target while ignoring a salient irrelevant distractor. To induce state anxiety, unpredictable, unavoidable, and sporadic shocks were administered during threat blocks, while no shocks were administered during safe blocks. The results showed that threat significantly increased oculomotor capture and dwell time on the salient distractor in the feature search task, but had no effect in the singleton detection task. These findings suggest that state anxiety may selectively impair template-based rejection and disengagement mechanisms required for feature search, whereas purely priority-guided selection during singleton detection leaves little room for additional modulation. Our results highlight that task demands determine how threat-induced state anxiety modulates salience-driven capture.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.29803385
Primary Topic
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The role of state anxiety in salience-driven distractor processing: evidence from singleton detection and feature search

Figshare
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
article

The role of state anxiety in salience-driven distractor processing: evidence from singleton detection and feature search

article en

Abstract

Salient but irrelevant distractors automatically capture attention in singleton detection search but not in feature search, due to the different search strategies adopt by observers. While state anxiety has been associated with increased salience-driven capture, it remains unclear whether such effects extend to feature search, which relies more on top-down control. The present study addressed this question using an eye-tracking technique, combining the threat of shock with the singleton detection and feature search tasks. Participants were instructed to execute speeded saccades to the target while ignoring a salient irrelevant distractor. To induce state anxiety, unpredictable, unavoidable, and sporadic shocks were administered during threat blocks, while no shocks were administered during safe blocks. The results showed that threat significantly increased oculomotor capture and dwell time on the salient distractor in the feature search task, but had no effect in the singleton detection task. These findings suggest that state anxiety may selectively impair template-based rejection and disengagement mechanisms required for feature search, whereas purely priority-guided selection during singleton detection leaves little room for additional modulation. Our results highlight that task demands determine how threat-induced state anxiety modulates salience-driven capture.

Figshare
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.