Type I Error Control of an Adaptive Endpoint Selection Procedure

In clinical trials, a single primary endpoint or a primary endpoint family is traditionally pre-specified before trial initiation. While in general the primary endpoint(s) of a trial should not be altered thereafter, there may be situations where the pre-specified primary analysis no longer makes sense. For example, when endpoint sensitivity is markedly less than expected. To investigate the operating characteristics of endpoint adaptation, we present two approaches to tackle this problem: primary endpoint adaptation based on (a) unblinded or (b) blinded estimate of the coefficient of variation from the control group. We show that the adaptation method based on blinded data introduced in this article has strong control of the family-wise Type I error, while the adaptation based on unblinded data does not. We examine the asymptotic conditions under which the adaptation based on blinded data correctly chooses the most powerful endpoint. We also compare the performance of the blinded adaptation with other potential approaches. We present a case study illustrating how the proposed blinded adaptation could have been used in a real clinical trial. Finally, we provide recommendations on how to implement the adaptation in practice.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.28248079
Primary Topic
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Type I Error Control of an Adaptive Endpoint Selection Procedure

Figshare
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
article

Type I Error Control of an Adaptive Endpoint Selection Procedure

article en

Abstract

In clinical trials, a single primary endpoint or a primary endpoint family is traditionally pre-specified before trial initiation. While in general the primary endpoint(s) of a trial should not be altered thereafter, there may be situations where the pre-specified primary analysis no longer makes sense. For example, when endpoint sensitivity is markedly less than expected. To investigate the operating characteristics of endpoint adaptation, we present two approaches to tackle this problem: primary endpoint adaptation based on (a) unblinded or (b) blinded estimate of the coefficient of variation from the control group. We show that the adaptation method based on blinded data introduced in this article has strong control of the family-wise Type I error, while the adaptation based on unblinded data does not. We examine the asymptotic conditions under which the adaptation based on blinded data correctly chooses the most powerful endpoint. We also compare the performance of the blinded adaptation with other potential approaches. We present a case study illustrating how the proposed blinded adaptation could have been used in a real clinical trial. Finally, we provide recommendations on how to implement the adaptation in practice.

Figshare
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.