Surveillance of colorectal neoplasia: a review of guidelines, current evidence, and future directions

About one third of individuals undergoing colonoscopy for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening are found to have neoplasms that require ongoing colonoscopic surveillance for metachronous neoplasia. Current guidelines for post-polypectomy surveillance interval are based on polyp features of size, histology, and multiplicity. Recent large, observational cohort studies delineate CRC risk among individuals with previous neoplasia while others investigate the role of incorporating patient and endoscopist characteristics in addition to polyp features to more precisely identify patients most likely to benefit from surveillance. Several gaps in colorectal neoplasia surveillance remain, including the role of noninvasive stool-based tests and surveillance cessation approaches for older adults. The purpose of this narrative review is to summarize current post-polypectomy surveillance guidelines from around the world, describe recent observational cohort studies quantifying post-polypectomy CRC risk, highlight novel approaches to risk-stratification for surveillance, summarize ongoing clinical trials of surveillance modalities and intervals that will impact practice, and outline an agenda for future research to further improve the efficiency and effectiveness of colorectal neoplasia surveillance.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.29608891
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Surveillance of colorectal neoplasia: a review of guidelines, current evidence, and future directions

Figshare
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
article

Surveillance of colorectal neoplasia: a review of guidelines, current evidence, and future directions

article en

Abstract

About one third of individuals undergoing colonoscopy for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening are found to have neoplasms that require ongoing colonoscopic surveillance for metachronous neoplasia. Current guidelines for post-polypectomy surveillance interval are based on polyp features of size, histology, and multiplicity. Recent large, observational cohort studies delineate CRC risk among individuals with previous neoplasia while others investigate the role of incorporating patient and endoscopist characteristics in addition to polyp features to more precisely identify patients most likely to benefit from surveillance. Several gaps in colorectal neoplasia surveillance remain, including the role of noninvasive stool-based tests and surveillance cessation approaches for older adults. The purpose of this narrative review is to summarize current post-polypectomy surveillance guidelines from around the world, describe recent observational cohort studies quantifying post-polypectomy CRC risk, highlight novel approaches to risk-stratification for surveillance, summarize ongoing clinical trials of surveillance modalities and intervals that will impact practice, and outline an agenda for future research to further improve the efficiency and effectiveness of colorectal neoplasia surveillance.

Figshare
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Surveillance of colorectal neoplasia: a review of guidelines, current evidence, and future directions · Figshare (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS