Difference Between Cycloplegic and Non-Cycloplegic Refraction and Its Association with Longitudinal Refractive Changes in Chinese Children

To investigate the difference between cycloplegic and non-cycloplegic spherical equivalent refraction (DSE) as well as the association between baseline DSE and future refractive changes in Chinese children. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of children aged 2–8 years who underwent auto-refraction at the Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Guangzhou, China, between 2009 and 2023. Cycloplegia was achieved with 1% atropine or 0.5% tropicamide. Participant demographics, cycloplegic and non-cycloplegic auto-refraction results and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), were extracted from the medical records. Multiple linear regression was used to identify the factors associated with the distribution and stability of DSE. A paired t-test was used to assess the stability of DSE over 6 months. Mixed-effect models were used to assess the association between baseline DSE and subsequent refractive changes. A total of 2909 children (mean age, 6.05 years; 45% girls) were included, with most children having a DSE between 0 and 1 D. Larger DSE was associated with younger age (β = -0.099; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.05) and more hyperopic SE (β = 0.495; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). A decline of DSE was observed after the age of 6. Stability analysis included 40 children (mean age, 5.63 years; 55% girls), with DSE showing stability over 6 months. Progression analysis of 752 children (mean age, 5.59 years; 46% girls) found no significant association between DSE and myopic shift. Younger and more hyperopic children exhibited larger DSE, DSE was not an independent risk factor for myopic shift.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.29291458.v1
Primary Topic
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Difference Between Cycloplegic and Non-Cycloplegic Refraction and Its Association with Longitudinal Refractive Changes in Chinese Children

Figshare
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
article

Difference Between Cycloplegic and Non-Cycloplegic Refraction and Its Association with Longitudinal Refractive Changes in Chinese Children

article en

Abstract

To investigate the difference between cycloplegic and non-cycloplegic spherical equivalent refraction (DSE) as well as the association between baseline DSE and future refractive changes in Chinese children. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of children aged 2–8 years who underwent auto-refraction at the Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Guangzhou, China, between 2009 and 2023. Cycloplegia was achieved with 1% atropine or 0.5% tropicamide. Participant demographics, cycloplegic and non-cycloplegic auto-refraction results and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), were extracted from the medical records. Multiple linear regression was used to identify the factors associated with the distribution and stability of DSE. A paired t-test was used to assess the stability of DSE over 6 months. Mixed-effect models were used to assess the association between baseline DSE and subsequent refractive changes. A total of 2909 children (mean age, 6.05 years; 45% girls) were included, with most children having a DSE between 0 and 1 D. Larger DSE was associated with younger age (β = -0.099; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.05) and more hyperopic SE (β = 0.495; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). A decline of DSE was observed after the age of 6. Stability analysis included 40 children (mean age, 5.63 years; 55% girls), with DSE showing stability over 6 months. Progression analysis of 752 children (mean age, 5.59 years; 46% girls) found no significant association between DSE and myopic shift. Younger and more hyperopic children exhibited larger DSE, DSE was not an independent risk factor for myopic shift.

Figshare
Openalex Percentile: Top 46%
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.