Effect of coping interventions on performance of medical students during objective structured clinical examination: A randomized controlled trial

Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) is a stressful exam assessing medical competencies. Stress coping strategies are expected to enhance students’ performance during OSCE. The objective was to determine the effect of short preventive coping interventions on performance of medical students. Double-blinded, randomized controlled trial with multiple arms and a superiority hypothesis. Enrolment was proposed to each fourth-year undergraduate medical student convened to the Lyon Est University OSCE in 2022. There was no exclusion criterion. Students were randomized to one of four groups: standardized breathing with cardiac biofeedback (BFB), mindfulness-based intervention (MBI), positive psychology intervention (PPI), or control (CTRL). Each intervention was video-guided, lasted six minutes, and occurred just before starting the OSCE. The primary outcome was the academic OSCE score, assessed through specific grids by university examiners blinded to the interventions. Secondary outcomes included specific performance scores, and student perception of the influence of the intervention on their performance. A total of 482 students were included. No difference was found between BFB (−0.17 [95%CI, −1.20 to 0.86], <i>p</i> = .749), MBI (0.32 [95%CI, −0.71 to 1.36], <i>p</i> = .540), or PPI groups (−0.25 [95%CI, −1.29 to 0.79], <i>p</i> = .637) on the academic OSCE score compared to the control group, nor regarding the specific performance scores. Compared to the control group, the students perceived that the intervention influenced more positively their performance (BFB +3 [95%CI, 0–8]), <i>p</i> &lt; .001; MBI +4 [95%CI, 1–9], <i>p</i> = .040; PPI +1 [95%CI, 0–4], <i>p</i> = .040]). A single six-minute cardiac biofeedback, mindfulness, or positive psychology intervention performed by fourth-year medical students just before an OSCE did not improve their following academic performance. Still, students reported that the interventions helped them to enhance their performance. Future research should aim to further explore the perception of intervention on performance and potential long-term effects for students. The study protocol was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05393219.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.28131803
Primary Topic
Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effect of coping interventions on performance of medical students during objective structured clinical examination: A randomized controlled trial

Figshare
Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
article

Effect of coping interventions on performance of medical students during objective structured clinical examination: A randomized controlled trial

article en

Abstract

Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) is a stressful exam assessing medical competencies. Stress coping strategies are expected to enhance students’ performance during OSCE. The objective was to determine the effect of short preventive coping interventions on performance of medical students. Double-blinded, randomized controlled trial with multiple arms and a superiority hypothesis. Enrolment was proposed to each fourth-year undergraduate medical student convened to the Lyon Est University OSCE in 2022. There was no exclusion criterion. Students were randomized to one of four groups: standardized breathing with cardiac biofeedback (BFB), mindfulness-based intervention (MBI), positive psychology intervention (PPI), or control (CTRL). Each intervention was video-guided, lasted six minutes, and occurred just before starting the OSCE. The primary outcome was the academic OSCE score, assessed through specific grids by university examiners blinded to the interventions. Secondary outcomes included specific performance scores, and student perception of the influence of the intervention on their performance. A total of 482 students were included. No difference was found between BFB (−0.17 [95%CI, −1.20 to 0.86], <i>p</i> = .749), MBI (0.32 [95%CI, −0.71 to 1.36], <i>p</i> = .540), or PPI groups (−0.25 [95%CI, −1.29 to 0.79], <i>p</i> = .637) on the academic OSCE score compared to the control group, nor regarding the specific performance scores. Compared to the control group, the students perceived that the intervention influenced more positively their performance (BFB +3 [95%CI, 0–8]), <i>p</i> &lt; .001; MBI +4 [95%CI, 1–9], <i>p</i> = .040; PPI +1 [95%CI, 0–4], <i>p</i> = .040]). A single six-minute cardiac biofeedback, mindfulness, or positive psychology intervention performed by fourth-year medical students just before an OSCE did not improve their following academic performance. Still, students reported that the interventions helped them to enhance their performance. Future research should aim to further explore the perception of intervention on performance and potential long-term effects for students. The study protocol was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05393219.

Figshare
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 41%
Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Effect of coping interventions on performance of medical students during objective structured clinical examination: A randomized controlled trial · Figshare (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS