Cluster-robust standard errors with three-level data

Using cluster robust standard errors (CRSEs) is a common approach used when analyzing clustered datasets. When using three-level models (e.g., students within classrooms within schools), the highest level generally has fewer clusters than the intermediate level and, with clustered data using CRSEs, the general advice is to cluster at the highest level. However, traditional CRSEs are still known to be underestimated when used with a low number of clusters resulting in higher type I error rates. We investigated the use of two different CRSE formulations together with degrees of freedom (<i>df</i>) adjustments using a Monte Carlo simulation. We found that even though CRSEs may be downwardly biased with a low number of clusters, when the CR2 estimator of Bell and McCaffrey (2002) was used with the Satterthwaite <i>df</i> adjustment, coverage rates were acceptable even with a few clusters using three-level data. Traditional CRSEs should not be relied on with three-level data if there are only a few clusters at the highest level. An applied example is provided as well.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.28380143
Primary Topic
Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cluster-robust standard errors with three-level data

Figshare
Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
article

Cluster-robust standard errors with three-level data

article en

Abstract

Using cluster robust standard errors (CRSEs) is a common approach used when analyzing clustered datasets. When using three-level models (e.g., students within classrooms within schools), the highest level generally has fewer clusters than the intermediate level and, with clustered data using CRSEs, the general advice is to cluster at the highest level. However, traditional CRSEs are still known to be underestimated when used with a low number of clusters resulting in higher type I error rates. We investigated the use of two different CRSE formulations together with degrees of freedom (<i>df</i>) adjustments using a Monte Carlo simulation. We found that even though CRSEs may be downwardly biased with a low number of clusters, when the CR2 estimator of Bell and McCaffrey (2002) was used with the Satterthwaite <i>df</i> adjustment, coverage rates were acceptable even with a few clusters using three-level data. Traditional CRSEs should not be relied on with three-level data if there are only a few clusters at the highest level. An applied example is provided as well.

Figshare
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.