Intrauterine devices and gynaecological malignancies - an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses

The intrauterine device (IUD) is globally recognised as a safe, cost-effective, and reliable contraceptive. This umbrella review and meta-analysis synthesises current evidence regarding the association between IUD usage and incidence of gynaecological and breast malignancies. A comprehensive search of PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Ovid databases was conducted for systematic reviews and meta-analyses examining any type of IUD in relation to gynaecological and breast cancers. The screening and data extraction processes adhered to PRISMA guidelines, and random-effects meta-analysis was employed for data synthesis. 323 titles and abstracts were screened, leading to the review of 41 full texts and the inclusion of 17 articles. Analyses of these articles and of their 32 primary sources indicated a decreased risk of cervical, endometrial and ovarian cancer for ever-users of IUD (respective OR: 0.63 [95% CI 0.48–0.82], 0.41 [0.31–0.54], and 0.71 [0.59–0.86]; all <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Our analysis did not yield any statistically significant association between IUD use and breast cancer risk (OR 1.00 [0.70–1.41], <i>p</i> = 0.99). IUD use is associated with a reduced risk of ovarian, endometrial, and cervical cancers, while no link was found with breast cancer. These findings can inform patient counselling on the benefits and risks of IUD use. This umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses assesses the risk of breast and gynaecological malignancy with intrauterine contraception use. It reveals a reduced risk of ovarian, endometrial and cervical cancer with ever-use of intrauterine contraceptives.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.29109757.v1
Primary Topic
Reproductive Health and Contraception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Intrauterine devices and gynaecological malignancies - an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses

Figshare
Reproductive Health and Contraception
article

Intrauterine devices and gynaecological malignancies - an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses

article en

Abstract

The intrauterine device (IUD) is globally recognised as a safe, cost-effective, and reliable contraceptive. This umbrella review and meta-analysis synthesises current evidence regarding the association between IUD usage and incidence of gynaecological and breast malignancies. A comprehensive search of PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Ovid databases was conducted for systematic reviews and meta-analyses examining any type of IUD in relation to gynaecological and breast cancers. The screening and data extraction processes adhered to PRISMA guidelines, and random-effects meta-analysis was employed for data synthesis. 323 titles and abstracts were screened, leading to the review of 41 full texts and the inclusion of 17 articles. Analyses of these articles and of their 32 primary sources indicated a decreased risk of cervical, endometrial and ovarian cancer for ever-users of IUD (respective OR: 0.63 [95% CI 0.48–0.82], 0.41 [0.31–0.54], and 0.71 [0.59–0.86]; all <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Our analysis did not yield any statistically significant association between IUD use and breast cancer risk (OR 1.00 [0.70–1.41], <i>p</i> = 0.99). IUD use is associated with a reduced risk of ovarian, endometrial, and cervical cancers, while no link was found with breast cancer. These findings can inform patient counselling on the benefits and risks of IUD use. This umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses assesses the risk of breast and gynaecological malignancy with intrauterine contraception use. It reveals a reduced risk of ovarian, endometrial and cervical cancer with ever-use of intrauterine contraceptives.

Figshare
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 46%
Reproductive Health and Contraception
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.