Treatment patterns and clinical outcomes of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma—a cohort study of 1020 patients in Sweden

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a significant global health burden. Examining treatment sequencing before the introduction of immune-based therapies is important for understanding the role and necessity of modern treatment approaches. This retrospective study analysed 1020 patients with HCC treated at Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, between 2010 and 2017 to explore treatment sequencing, and clinical outcomes. Treatment decisions followed a modified Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) algorithm, and patients were stratified by disease stage and by type of treatment. Initial treatment strategies included best supportive care (BSC, 32%), ablation (20%), transarterial chemoembolization (TACE, 22%), systemic therapy (12%), resection (12%), and liver transplantation (3%). Median survival ranged from 4.8 years in BCLC 0 to 2.3 months in BCLC D. Curative treatments, particularly liver transplantation, achieved the highest five-year survival (82%), whereas systemic therapy and BSC had the poorest five-year survival (2% and 0%). Despite curative intent, disease recurrence was common, necessitating further treatment in most patients. Treatment sequencing revealed that 37% of patients required a second treatment, and 18% progressed to a third line of therapy. This study underscores the challenges of managing HCC in a real-world setting, including late diagnosis and high recurrence rates following curative treatments. Real-world treatment deviations from guidelines were observed, often influenced by patient comorbidities, performance status, or other clinical considerations. This study examined treatment patterns and outcomes for liver cancer patients in Stockholm, Sweden, before immune-based therapies were available. Most patients were diagnosed late, with supportive care being the most common initial treatment. While potentially curative treatments like liver transplantation offered the best long-term survival, many patients experienced disease progression, highlighting the need for earlier diagnosis and improved therapies.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.29581881.v1
Primary Topic
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Treatment patterns and clinical outcomes of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma—a cohort study of 1020 patients in Sweden

Figshare
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
article

Treatment patterns and clinical outcomes of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma—a cohort study of 1020 patients in Sweden

article en

Abstract

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a significant global health burden. Examining treatment sequencing before the introduction of immune-based therapies is important for understanding the role and necessity of modern treatment approaches. This retrospective study analysed 1020 patients with HCC treated at Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, between 2010 and 2017 to explore treatment sequencing, and clinical outcomes. Treatment decisions followed a modified Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) algorithm, and patients were stratified by disease stage and by type of treatment. Initial treatment strategies included best supportive care (BSC, 32%), ablation (20%), transarterial chemoembolization (TACE, 22%), systemic therapy (12%), resection (12%), and liver transplantation (3%). Median survival ranged from 4.8 years in BCLC 0 to 2.3 months in BCLC D. Curative treatments, particularly liver transplantation, achieved the highest five-year survival (82%), whereas systemic therapy and BSC had the poorest five-year survival (2% and 0%). Despite curative intent, disease recurrence was common, necessitating further treatment in most patients. Treatment sequencing revealed that 37% of patients required a second treatment, and 18% progressed to a third line of therapy. This study underscores the challenges of managing HCC in a real-world setting, including late diagnosis and high recurrence rates following curative treatments. Real-world treatment deviations from guidelines were observed, often influenced by patient comorbidities, performance status, or other clinical considerations. This study examined treatment patterns and outcomes for liver cancer patients in Stockholm, Sweden, before immune-based therapies were available. Most patients were diagnosed late, with supportive care being the most common initial treatment. While potentially curative treatments like liver transplantation offered the best long-term survival, many patients experienced disease progression, highlighting the need for earlier diagnosis and improved therapies.

Figshare
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 44%
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Treatment patterns and clinical outcomes of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma—a cohort study of 1020 patients in Sweden · Figshare (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS