How to make stakeholder participation work? Constructing legitimacy in environmental policymaking

Stakeholder participation has become a popular tool in environmental policy-making. Such participation holds the promise of fostering the legitimacy of policies and thus reducing the costs of enforcement. Legitimacy can be – and often has been – assessed from a normative tradition, by means of a fixed set of procedural or substantive criteria. From the sociological tradition, legitimacy and stakeholder participation are considered a social construct, in which it is recognized that legitimacy is not intrinsic to the process or output of participation, but instead relies on stakeholders’ perceptions of both, which is also informed by past processes and experiences. We propose a novel way of understanding and assessing environmental groups’ perceptions of legitimacy and illegitimacy, combining insights and theories from political science and history, and we apply this approach to two policy-making processes: the Dutch Climate Agreement and the Integrated Approach to Nitrogen. We found that past processes and experiences influence the perception of legitimacy in current processes. Moreover, we uncovered new participation needs that positively contribute to the perception of legitimacy and that do not yet fit within the more classic normative tradition.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.28169966.v1
Primary Topic
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How to make stakeholder participation work? Constructing legitimacy in environmental policymaking

Figshare
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
article

How to make stakeholder participation work? Constructing legitimacy in environmental policymaking

article en

Abstract

Stakeholder participation has become a popular tool in environmental policy-making. Such participation holds the promise of fostering the legitimacy of policies and thus reducing the costs of enforcement. Legitimacy can be – and often has been – assessed from a normative tradition, by means of a fixed set of procedural or substantive criteria. From the sociological tradition, legitimacy and stakeholder participation are considered a social construct, in which it is recognized that legitimacy is not intrinsic to the process or output of participation, but instead relies on stakeholders’ perceptions of both, which is also informed by past processes and experiences. We propose a novel way of understanding and assessing environmental groups’ perceptions of legitimacy and illegitimacy, combining insights and theories from political science and history, and we apply this approach to two policy-making processes: the Dutch Climate Agreement and the Integrated Approach to Nitrogen. We found that past processes and experiences influence the perception of legitimacy in current processes. Moreover, we uncovered new participation needs that positively contribute to the perception of legitimacy and that do not yet fit within the more classic normative tradition.

Figshare
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

How to make stakeholder participation work? Constructing legitimacy in environmental policymaking · Figshare (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS