NAMING OF CHILD: A HISTORICAL-LEGAL ANALYSIS OF NAMING LAWS IN INDIA, SWEDEN, NORWAY, DENMARK, GERMANY, FRANCE, AND THE UNITED KINGDOM

<b>ABSTRACT</b>Legal regulation of child naming exhibits considerable variation across different nations. This study employs a historical-comparative methodology to examine the development of naming laws in India, Sweden, Norway, Denmark, Germany, France, and the United Kingdom. While child naming has traditionally been regarded as a private cultural practice, it has increasingly come under formal legal oversight. The analysis of statutory provisions, judicial decisions, and administrative practices reveals that India generally adopts a permissive stance, whereas several European countries— particularly the Nordic states—implement more restrictive measures grounded in concerns for child welfare, administrative order, and the protection of national identity. This paper argues for the adoption of a balanced legal framework that safeguards cultural diversity and personal dignity, while ensuring effective administrative governance.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.29497151.v1
Primary Topic
Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

NAMING OF CHILD: A HISTORICAL-LEGAL ANALYSIS OF NAMING LAWS IN INDIA, SWEDEN, NORWAY, DENMARK, GERMANY, FRANCE, AND THE UNITED KINGDOM

Figshare
Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research
article

NAMING OF CHILD: A HISTORICAL-LEGAL ANALYSIS OF NAMING LAWS IN INDIA, SWEDEN, NORWAY, DENMARK, GERMANY, FRANCE, AND THE UNITED KINGDOM

article en

Abstract

<b>ABSTRACT</b>Legal regulation of child naming exhibits considerable variation across different nations. This study employs a historical-comparative methodology to examine the development of naming laws in India, Sweden, Norway, Denmark, Germany, France, and the United Kingdom. While child naming has traditionally been regarded as a private cultural practice, it has increasingly come under formal legal oversight. The analysis of statutory provisions, judicial decisions, and administrative practices reveals that India generally adopts a permissive stance, whereas several European countries— particularly the Nordic states—implement more restrictive measures grounded in concerns for child welfare, administrative order, and the protection of national identity. This paper argues for the adoption of a balanced legal framework that safeguards cultural diversity and personal dignity, while ensuring effective administrative governance.

Figshare
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.