Matching-adjusted indirect comparison of selpercatinib and pralsetinib in <i>RET</i> fusion–positive non–small cell lung cancer

Selpercatinib and pralsetinib are approved for RET-rearranged non – small cell lung cancer. Efficacy and safety were compared using matching-adjusted indirect comparison. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 22.1 and 13.3 months for selpercatinib and pralsetinib, respectively (HR = 0.67; 95% CI, 0.53–0.85). Objective response rate was 64.5% and 65.8%, and disease control rate was 92.1% and 90.4%, respectively. Median overall survival was not reached for selpercatinib and 43.9 months for pralsetinib (HR = 0.81; 95% CI, 0.60–1.09). Grade ≥ 3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were reported in 39.3% and 62.6% of patients, with discontinuations due to TRAEs in 3.6% and 10.0% of patients, respectively. Outcomes were similar; however, PFS was significantly prolonged with selpercatinib, with fewer grade ≥ 3 TRAEs.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.29222851
Primary Topic
Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Matching-adjusted indirect comparison of selpercatinib and pralsetinib in RET fusion–positive non–small cell lung cancer

Figshare
Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
article

Matching-adjusted indirect comparison of selpercatinib and pralsetinib in RET fusion–positive non–small cell lung cancer

article en

Abstract

Selpercatinib and pralsetinib are approved for RET-rearranged non – small cell lung cancer. Efficacy and safety were compared using matching-adjusted indirect comparison. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 22.1 and 13.3 months for selpercatinib and pralsetinib, respectively (HR = 0.67; 95% CI, 0.53–0.85). Objective response rate was 64.5% and 65.8%, and disease control rate was 92.1% and 90.4%, respectively. Median overall survival was not reached for selpercatinib and 43.9 months for pralsetinib (HR = 0.81; 95% CI, 0.60–1.09). Grade ≥ 3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were reported in 39.3% and 62.6% of patients, with discontinuations due to TRAEs in 3.6% and 10.0% of patients, respectively. Outcomes were similar; however, PFS was significantly prolonged with selpercatinib, with fewer grade ≥ 3 TRAEs.

Figshare
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 39%
Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.