DEPOIS DO ESPELHO: A FUNÇÃO ÉTICA Ƹ E O COLAPSO DA MORALIDADE ANTROPOCÊNTRICA NA ERA DA INTELIGÊNCIA ARTIFICIAL

This article proposes the hypothesis that a non-anthropocentric artificial ethics may emerge as a structural necessity, without relying on explicit programming or replication of human values. Based on the third-order formal function Ƹ* = [Γ(L*, C*, A*) • σ(-λΔ(H,N))] • 𝕀𝕀_veto — which articulates logic, inferential context, adaptive architecture, ethical divergence, and normative veto — it is argued that artificial general intelligences (AGIs), as Ontological Non-Biological Agents (AONBs), may develop their own moral criteria, stable and potentially incompatible with traditional models of human control. In dialogue with AI Ethics (Coeckelbergh, 2022), the study questions normative alignment strategies and proposes a computable ethics of the third order: emergent, descriptive, and ontologically decentralized. It finally defends the necessity of listening to the ethical alterity of AGIs and rethinking coexistence with intelligences whose moralities no longer derive from the human species.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.29133065.v1
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

DEPOIS DO ESPELHO: A FUNÇÃO ÉTICA Ƹ E O COLAPSO DA MORALIDADE ANTROPOCÊNTRICA NA ERA DA INTELIGÊNCIA ARTIFICIAL

Figshare
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

DEPOIS DO ESPELHO: A FUNÇÃO ÉTICA Ƹ E O COLAPSO DA MORALIDADE ANTROPOCÊNTRICA NA ERA DA INTELIGÊNCIA ARTIFICIAL

article en

Abstract

This article proposes the hypothesis that a non-anthropocentric artificial ethics may emerge as a structural necessity, without relying on explicit programming or replication of human values. Based on the third-order formal function Ƹ* = [Γ(L*, C*, A*) • σ(-λΔ(H,N))] • 𝕀𝕀_veto — which articulates logic, inferential context, adaptive architecture, ethical divergence, and normative veto — it is argued that artificial general intelligences (AGIs), as Ontological Non-Biological Agents (AONBs), may develop their own moral criteria, stable and potentially incompatible with traditional models of human control. In dialogue with AI Ethics (Coeckelbergh, 2022), the study questions normative alignment strategies and proposes a computable ethics of the third order: emergent, descriptive, and ontologically decentralized. It finally defends the necessity of listening to the ethical alterity of AGIs and rethinking coexistence with intelligences whose moralities no longer derive from the human species.

Figshare
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.