A scoping review of factors associated with the prescribing choice of direct oral anticoagulant drugs

With the substantial increase in direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) usage, prescribers face complex decisions regarding the appropriate agent selection. This scoping review aimed to identify factors influencing oral anticoagulant choice in clinical practice over time. Four databases (Medline, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science) were searched for quantitative observational studies on patients prescribed DOACs for any indication, focusing on factors affecting OAC choice. Studies published from January 2010 to March 2023 were included. Of the 4659 identified studies, 60 met selection criteria. Most (96%) examined the choice between DOACs and vitamin K antagonists (VKA); while (15%) evaluated factors affecting choice among DOACs. Age and gender were included in 77% and 70% of studies, respectively. Renal impairment (58%), heart failure (48%), previous stroke (43%), and thromboembolic risk (43%) were also commonly assessed. Older age had a significant negative association with DOAC prescribing in (50%) of the studies; renal impairment reduced DOAC initiation, favoring warfarin in (94%). Several significant key factors were identified as being associated with OAC choice, including demographic factors such as age, and clinical factors such as kidney function, prior stroke, and other comorbidities. Significant factors in the choice among DOACs were advanced age, and renal impairment. This systematic review was registered as a PURE protocol (https://pureportal.strath.ac.uk/en/projects/factors-associated-with-the-prescribing-of-direct-acting-oral-ant).

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.29588666
Primary Topic
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A scoping review of factors associated with the prescribing choice of direct oral anticoagulant drugs

Figshare
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
article

A scoping review of factors associated with the prescribing choice of direct oral anticoagulant drugs

article en

Abstract

With the substantial increase in direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) usage, prescribers face complex decisions regarding the appropriate agent selection. This scoping review aimed to identify factors influencing oral anticoagulant choice in clinical practice over time. Four databases (Medline, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science) were searched for quantitative observational studies on patients prescribed DOACs for any indication, focusing on factors affecting OAC choice. Studies published from January 2010 to March 2023 were included. Of the 4659 identified studies, 60 met selection criteria. Most (96%) examined the choice between DOACs and vitamin K antagonists (VKA); while (15%) evaluated factors affecting choice among DOACs. Age and gender were included in 77% and 70% of studies, respectively. Renal impairment (58%), heart failure (48%), previous stroke (43%), and thromboembolic risk (43%) were also commonly assessed. Older age had a significant negative association with DOAC prescribing in (50%) of the studies; renal impairment reduced DOAC initiation, favoring warfarin in (94%). Several significant key factors were identified as being associated with OAC choice, including demographic factors such as age, and clinical factors such as kidney function, prior stroke, and other comorbidities. Significant factors in the choice among DOACs were advanced age, and renal impairment. This systematic review was registered as a PURE protocol (https://pureportal.strath.ac.uk/en/projects/factors-associated-with-the-prescribing-of-direct-acting-oral-ant).

Figshare
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 41%
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.