Subjective appraisal of cognition among American racial groups

While subjective appraisal of cognition (SAC) has been shown to differ by race, it is unknown whether the consistency between self- and informant reports of cognition varies by race. The present study investigated this gap using a large, community-based cohort of healthy older adults. Participants and close informants from the National Alzheimer’s Coordinating Center reported the presence or absence of participant memory decline. Four groups were created by combining the participants’ and informants’ appraisal of the participants’ cognition. Bayesian contingency tables and <i>t</i>-tests examined racial group differences. Native Americans reported more cases of cognitive decline compared to Black (BF<sub>10</sub> = 7) and White (BF<sub>10</sub> = 3.6) Americans. No differences in reports of cognitive decline were found between White, Black, and Asian Americans (BF<sub>10</sub> &lt; 0.1). There was also strong evidence that Native Americans reported more depressive symptoms compared to Black (BF<sub>10</sub> = 10.5) and White (BF<sub>10</sub> = 6.3) Americans after correcting for memory complaints. Reports of cognitive decline were similar amongst most racial groups, although Native American participants and their close informants reported cognitive decline more frequently. A limited set of objective cognitive measures did not differ between racial groups. However, slightly greater reported depressive symptoms among Native Americans may partially contribute to the observed differences.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.29850097
Primary Topic
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Subjective appraisal of cognition among American racial groups

Figshare
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
article

Subjective appraisal of cognition among American racial groups

article en

Abstract

While subjective appraisal of cognition (SAC) has been shown to differ by race, it is unknown whether the consistency between self- and informant reports of cognition varies by race. The present study investigated this gap using a large, community-based cohort of healthy older adults. Participants and close informants from the National Alzheimer’s Coordinating Center reported the presence or absence of participant memory decline. Four groups were created by combining the participants’ and informants’ appraisal of the participants’ cognition. Bayesian contingency tables and <i>t</i>-tests examined racial group differences. Native Americans reported more cases of cognitive decline compared to Black (BF<sub>10</sub> = 7) and White (BF<sub>10</sub> = 3.6) Americans. No differences in reports of cognitive decline were found between White, Black, and Asian Americans (BF<sub>10</sub> &lt; 0.1). There was also strong evidence that Native Americans reported more depressive symptoms compared to Black (BF<sub>10</sub> = 10.5) and White (BF<sub>10</sub> = 6.3) Americans after correcting for memory complaints. Reports of cognitive decline were similar amongst most racial groups, although Native American participants and their close informants reported cognitive decline more frequently. A limited set of objective cognitive measures did not differ between racial groups. However, slightly greater reported depressive symptoms among Native Americans may partially contribute to the observed differences.

Figshare
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.