Untitled Ite<b>A note on superluminalization of SRT and some central concerns of</b><b>contemporary physics</b><b>A note on superluminalization of SRT and some central concerns of</b><b>contemporary physics</b><b>A note on superluminalization of SRT

Over the past decades and more recently, there has been a significant effort and renewed interest in<br>extending special relativity theory beyond the speed of light. In this comprehensive note, the paper “Relativity<br>of superluminal observers in 1+3 spacetime” by Dragan et al. [1] is examined. The authors attempted to<br>extend the aforementioned theory to superluminal inertial reference frames by generalizing Parker’s twodimensional transformation with the addition of two pairs of spatial dimensions. This approach is not novel<br>and is already well-documented in the literature. It is demonstrated that unlike Lorentz transformations, the<br>authors’ transformations do not form an orthogonal-orthochronous group due to their negative determinant.<br>Consequently, principles such as relativity, causality, spatial isotropy, and temporal ordering cannot be<br>preserved. The authors’pseudo-transformations are revealed to be reflections in a plane through the origin<br>rather than true transformations. Also, a theoretical maximum limit of the Lorentz factor is introduced, which<br>leads to an extension of Lorentz transformations to luminal inertial reference frames and raises a conceptual<br>question about the status and role of the symbolic quantity ‘c’, commonly called the speed of light in vacuum,<br>as the neutrino and particularly the photon have non-zero mass. Therefore, it appears that as long as the nonzero mass of the photon is not taken seriously into full consideration, our current knowledge of physics,<br>astronomy, astrophysics, and cosmology remains not only incomplete but above all vague and doubtful.Moreover, this inclusive note highlights Hassani superluminal spatio-temporal transformations, which possess the algebraic structure of a linear group and serve as a generalization of Lorentz transformations for superluminal inertial reference frames. These transformations are anticipated to be fundamental in superluminal relativistic mechanics.<br><br><br><br><br><br>

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.28588871.v1
Primary Topic
Relativity and Gravitational Theory
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Untitled IteA note on superluminalization of SRT and some central concerns ofcontemporary physicsA note on superluminalization of SRT and some central concerns ofcontemporary physicsA note on superluminalization of SRT

Figshare
Relativity and Gravitational Theory
article

Untitled IteA note on superluminalization of SRT and some central concerns ofcontemporary physicsA note on superluminalization of SRT and some central concerns ofcontemporary physicsA note on superluminalization of SRT

article en

Abstract

Over the past decades and more recently, there has been a significant effort and renewed interest in<br>extending special relativity theory beyond the speed of light. In this comprehensive note, the paper “Relativity<br>of superluminal observers in 1+3 spacetime” by Dragan et al. [1] is examined. The authors attempted to<br>extend the aforementioned theory to superluminal inertial reference frames by generalizing Parker’s twodimensional transformation with the addition of two pairs of spatial dimensions. This approach is not novel<br>and is already well-documented in the literature. It is demonstrated that unlike Lorentz transformations, the<br>authors’ transformations do not form an orthogonal-orthochronous group due to their negative determinant.<br>Consequently, principles such as relativity, causality, spatial isotropy, and temporal ordering cannot be<br>preserved. The authors’pseudo-transformations are revealed to be reflections in a plane through the origin<br>rather than true transformations. Also, a theoretical maximum limit of the Lorentz factor is introduced, which<br>leads to an extension of Lorentz transformations to luminal inertial reference frames and raises a conceptual<br>question about the status and role of the symbolic quantity ‘c’, commonly called the speed of light in vacuum,<br>as the neutrino and particularly the photon have non-zero mass. Therefore, it appears that as long as the nonzero mass of the photon is not taken seriously into full consideration, our current knowledge of physics,<br>astronomy, astrophysics, and cosmology remains not only incomplete but above all vague and doubtful.Moreover, this inclusive note highlights Hassani superluminal spatio-temporal transformations, which possess the algebraic structure of a linear group and serve as a generalization of Lorentz transformations for superluminal inertial reference frames. These transformations are anticipated to be fundamental in superluminal relativistic mechanics.<br><br><br><br><br><br>

Figshare
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Relativity and Gravitational Theory
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.