Assessing the impact of Fridays for Future on climate policy and policymaking in German cities

During 2019, Fridays for Future (FfF) groups were highly active across the globe, calling for changes to both policy outputs (specifically, a more ambitious climate mitigation approach) and policymaking processes (namely, greater public participation and civil society involvement in decision-making). However, we lack a comprehensive assessment of the changes the movement may have induced, and why it may have been more successful in some places than others. Building on Hall’s (1993) three orders of change, and drawing on interviews and document analysis in 25 German cities, we develop and apply a framework to measure its influence. We found that all 25 cities did change their policymaking processes as a result of FfF pressure, and most also introduced more ambitious policy outputs. In particular, we found FfF had more success in those cities where greater scope for a step-change in climate ambition existed: namely, where socioeconomic, demographic and political conditions were amenable to progressive climate policy, but where the municipality had hitherto not been a leader in the field. Conversely, the movement had less impact in leading cities and in places with poorer and older inhabitants and stronger far-right representation.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.28433700
Primary Topic
Spectral Theory in Mathematical Physics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing the impact of Fridays for Future on climate policy and policymaking in German cities

Figshare
Spectral Theory in Mathematical Physics
article

Assessing the impact of Fridays for Future on climate policy and policymaking in German cities

article en

Abstract

During 2019, Fridays for Future (FfF) groups were highly active across the globe, calling for changes to both policy outputs (specifically, a more ambitious climate mitigation approach) and policymaking processes (namely, greater public participation and civil society involvement in decision-making). However, we lack a comprehensive assessment of the changes the movement may have induced, and why it may have been more successful in some places than others. Building on Hall’s (1993) three orders of change, and drawing on interviews and document analysis in 25 German cities, we develop and apply a framework to measure its influence. We found that all 25 cities did change their policymaking processes as a result of FfF pressure, and most also introduced more ambitious policy outputs. In particular, we found FfF had more success in those cities where greater scope for a step-change in climate ambition existed: namely, where socioeconomic, demographic and political conditions were amenable to progressive climate policy, but where the municipality had hitherto not been a leader in the field. Conversely, the movement had less impact in leading cities and in places with poorer and older inhabitants and stronger far-right representation.

Figshare
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Spectral Theory in Mathematical Physics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Assessing the impact of Fridays for Future on climate policy and policymaking in German cities · Figshare (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS