The association between driving under the influence of alcohol and seatbelt usage in Korea

Despite the mandatory use of seatbelts in Korea, their prevalence remains comparatively low. This study examines whether DUIA, a leading risk factor for road traffic injuries, predicts seatbelt usage by analyzing the prevalence of seatbelt use among individuals who have experienced DUIA compared to those who have not. This cross-sectional study utilized data from 9,227 driver’s license holders aged 20 years or older from the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KHANES) conducted between 2019 and 2021. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was conducted to investigate the association between experience of DUIA and seatbelt use while adjusting for individual-level covariates. A stratified analysis was conducted based on sociodemographic variables. Finally, a subgroup analysis was performed to examine the association between experience of DUIA and frequency of seatbelt use in each seat type (the driver’s seat, the front passenger seat, and the rear seat). This study showed that having an experience of DUIA is significantly associated with not wearing seatbelts. (aOR, 3.53 [95% CI, 2.55–4.88]). Stratification based on sociodemographic variables showed that one’s job type (pink collar: aOR, 5.67 [95% CI, 2.03–15.88]; blue collar: aOR, 5.35 [95% CI, 3.03–9.47]), and smoking status (current smokers: aOR, 5.67 [95% CI, 2.72–11.82]) increase the prevalence of experience of DUIA. Furthermore, experience of DUIA was associated with an increased prevalence of not wearing seatbelts in all seat types. The prevalence of experience of DUIA can be established as a statistically significant independent predictor of seatbelt usage among Korean adults.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.29225484
Primary Topic
Traffic and Road Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The association between driving under the influence of alcohol and seatbelt usage in Korea

Figshare
Traffic and Road Safety
article

The association between driving under the influence of alcohol and seatbelt usage in Korea

article en

Abstract

Despite the mandatory use of seatbelts in Korea, their prevalence remains comparatively low. This study examines whether DUIA, a leading risk factor for road traffic injuries, predicts seatbelt usage by analyzing the prevalence of seatbelt use among individuals who have experienced DUIA compared to those who have not. This cross-sectional study utilized data from 9,227 driver’s license holders aged 20 years or older from the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KHANES) conducted between 2019 and 2021. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was conducted to investigate the association between experience of DUIA and seatbelt use while adjusting for individual-level covariates. A stratified analysis was conducted based on sociodemographic variables. Finally, a subgroup analysis was performed to examine the association between experience of DUIA and frequency of seatbelt use in each seat type (the driver’s seat, the front passenger seat, and the rear seat). This study showed that having an experience of DUIA is significantly associated with not wearing seatbelts. (aOR, 3.53 [95% CI, 2.55–4.88]). Stratification based on sociodemographic variables showed that one’s job type (pink collar: aOR, 5.67 [95% CI, 2.03–15.88]; blue collar: aOR, 5.35 [95% CI, 3.03–9.47]), and smoking status (current smokers: aOR, 5.67 [95% CI, 2.72–11.82]) increase the prevalence of experience of DUIA. Furthermore, experience of DUIA was associated with an increased prevalence of not wearing seatbelts in all seat types. The prevalence of experience of DUIA can be established as a statistically significant independent predictor of seatbelt usage among Korean adults.

Figshare
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Traffic and Road Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.