Tax expenditures as tools for state-level climate action in the U.S.

State governments in the United States offer a wide range of tax incentives to encourage the use of green technologies and support the energy transition away from fossil fuels. These tax incentives offer a politically palatable middle ground that subsidizes more environmentally friendly policies while also giving the appearance of reducing taxes. In this paper, we evaluate the extent of climate-related tax expenditures (i.e. the amount of foregone revenue from tax preferences) at the state level by collecting data from U.S. state budget documents and classifying and comparing the different types of tax expenditures across various dimensions. Our analysis yields three key findings: (1) ‘climate-friendly’ tax expenditures at the state level account for only about 0.1% of aggregate state tax collections and are negligible relative to federal incentives historically, (2) energy subsidies make up more than half of the incentives in dollar terms, and (3) both climate and fossil fuel subsidies exhibit substantial longevity due to the infrequency with which governments revisit or re-evaluate them. While these results suggest that there may be opportunities to better utilize tax incentives for climate policy, tax expenditures must be integrated more strategically into the broader landscape of budget and tax policy to efficiently advance climate goals. State-level tax incentives that target climate change are small relative to state budgets.State-level incentives are primarily aimed at the energy and transportation sectors.State climate incentives often persist in the tax code, as do fossil fuel subsidies.Updating and utilizing tax incentives to advance climate policy may be a politically advantageous way of overcoming political partisanship.Climate incentives need to be more broadly integrated into budget and tax policy to efficiently advance climate goals. State-level tax incentives that target climate change are small relative to state budgets. State-level incentives are primarily aimed at the energy and transportation sectors. State climate incentives often persist in the tax code, as do fossil fuel subsidies. Updating and utilizing tax incentives to advance climate policy may be a politically advantageous way of overcoming political partisanship. Climate incentives need to be more broadly integrated into budget and tax policy to efficiently advance climate goals.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.28776775.v1
Primary Topic
Climate Change Policy and Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Tax expenditures as tools for state-level climate action in the U.S.

Figshare
Climate Change Policy and Economics
article

Tax expenditures as tools for state-level climate action in the U.S.

article en

Abstract

State governments in the United States offer a wide range of tax incentives to encourage the use of green technologies and support the energy transition away from fossil fuels. These tax incentives offer a politically palatable middle ground that subsidizes more environmentally friendly policies while also giving the appearance of reducing taxes. In this paper, we evaluate the extent of climate-related tax expenditures (i.e. the amount of foregone revenue from tax preferences) at the state level by collecting data from U.S. state budget documents and classifying and comparing the different types of tax expenditures across various dimensions. Our analysis yields three key findings: (1) ‘climate-friendly’ tax expenditures at the state level account for only about 0.1% of aggregate state tax collections and are negligible relative to federal incentives historically, (2) energy subsidies make up more than half of the incentives in dollar terms, and (3) both climate and fossil fuel subsidies exhibit substantial longevity due to the infrequency with which governments revisit or re-evaluate them. While these results suggest that there may be opportunities to better utilize tax incentives for climate policy, tax expenditures must be integrated more strategically into the broader landscape of budget and tax policy to efficiently advance climate goals. State-level tax incentives that target climate change are small relative to state budgets.State-level incentives are primarily aimed at the energy and transportation sectors.State climate incentives often persist in the tax code, as do fossil fuel subsidies.Updating and utilizing tax incentives to advance climate policy may be a politically advantageous way of overcoming political partisanship.Climate incentives need to be more broadly integrated into budget and tax policy to efficiently advance climate goals. State-level tax incentives that target climate change are small relative to state budgets. State-level incentives are primarily aimed at the energy and transportation sectors. State climate incentives often persist in the tax code, as do fossil fuel subsidies. Updating and utilizing tax incentives to advance climate policy may be a politically advantageous way of overcoming political partisanship. Climate incentives need to be more broadly integrated into budget and tax policy to efficiently advance climate goals.

Figshare
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Climate Change Policy and Economics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Tax expenditures as tools for state-level climate action in the U.S. · Figshare (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS