Who benefits from public sustainable finance in the EU?

At this critical juncture in the climate crisis, public sustainable finance is increasingly recognised as crucial to addressing society’s socio-ecological challenges. However, we still know surprisingly little about its actual implementation. This paper examines the EU Just Transition Mechanism (JTM), a pioneering sustainable finance policy aimed at alleviating the costs of the transition to a sustainable economy. I present a political economy framework to analyze who benefits from these investments and why, highlighting the role of bureaucratic departments with different types of expertise and interests. Based on original data collection, I show substantial regional variation in allocation of the JTM to 1) employment, 2) equality, and 3) carbon neutrality. Moreover, a substantial part of the JTM is not used for any of these three areas. Regression analysis further reveals that allocation to employment projects is more likely when a ‘Social Affairs’ department is involved, while ‘Environmental Affairs’ departments are linked to carbon neutrality. Overall, this paper contributes to our understanding of who benefits from public sustainable finance in general.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.28544190.v1
Primary Topic
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Who benefits from public sustainable finance in the EU?

Figshare
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
article

Who benefits from public sustainable finance in the EU?

article en

Abstract

At this critical juncture in the climate crisis, public sustainable finance is increasingly recognised as crucial to addressing society’s socio-ecological challenges. However, we still know surprisingly little about its actual implementation. This paper examines the EU Just Transition Mechanism (JTM), a pioneering sustainable finance policy aimed at alleviating the costs of the transition to a sustainable economy. I present a political economy framework to analyze who benefits from these investments and why, highlighting the role of bureaucratic departments with different types of expertise and interests. Based on original data collection, I show substantial regional variation in allocation of the JTM to 1) employment, 2) equality, and 3) carbon neutrality. Moreover, a substantial part of the JTM is not used for any of these three areas. Regression analysis further reveals that allocation to employment projects is more likely when a ‘Social Affairs’ department is involved, while ‘Environmental Affairs’ departments are linked to carbon neutrality. Overall, this paper contributes to our understanding of who benefits from public sustainable finance in general.

Figshare
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Who benefits from public sustainable finance in the EU? · Figshare (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS