Relationship between clinical examination findings and objective nasal patency measures in structural nasal obstruction: A systematic review

Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of J.L.O. (1984) LIMITED. Background: The relationship between clinical examination findings and objective nasal patency measures (ONPM) in structural nasal obstruction remains uncertain. Objective: This review aims to explore the relationship between clinical nasal examination findings and ONPM using acoustic rhinometry, PNIF, rhinomanometry and rhinospirometry. Methods Qualitative systematic review using the PRISMA 2020 statement Results: 17 articles were included in the systematic review. Several studies showed a positive relationship between ONPM and clinical nasal examination findings, however evidence in the literature is limited and confined to cohort studies. ONPM using acoustic rhinometry, rhinomanometry and rhinospirometry assessment correlate positively in severe anterior septal deviation but its role in assessing middle/posterior and mild/moderate septal deviation in isolation remains uncertain. There is limited evidence in the literature to assess the relationship between PNIF and clinical examination findings. Conclusion: ONPM has a limited role in supporting clinical examination findings in severe structural nasal obstruction.

Publication Details

Journal
Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
Published
2025-08-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.57711/m6q1-fz45
Primary Topic
Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Relationship between clinical examination findings and objective nasal patency measures in structural nasal obstruction: A systematic review

Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies
article

Relationship between clinical examination findings and objective nasal patency measures in structural nasal obstruction: A systematic review

article en

Abstract

Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of J.L.O. (1984) LIMITED. Background: The relationship between clinical examination findings and objective nasal patency measures (ONPM) in structural nasal obstruction remains uncertain. Objective: This review aims to explore the relationship between clinical nasal examination findings and ONPM using acoustic rhinometry, PNIF, rhinomanometry and rhinospirometry. Methods Qualitative systematic review using the PRISMA 2020 statement Results: 17 articles were included in the systematic review. Several studies showed a positive relationship between ONPM and clinical nasal examination findings, however evidence in the literature is limited and confined to cohort studies. ONPM using acoustic rhinometry, rhinomanometry and rhinospirometry assessment correlate positively in severe anterior septal deviation but its role in assessing middle/posterior and mild/moderate septal deviation in isolation remains uncertain. There is limited evidence in the literature to assess the relationship between PNIF and clinical examination findings. Conclusion: ONPM has a limited role in supporting clinical examination findings in severe structural nasal obstruction.

Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.