The Construction of International Relations (IR) Theories in China

This paper reviews the debates among Chinese scholars regarding the development of Chinese International Relations (IR) theory. We demonstrate that these debates, which began in the 1980s, reflect an increasing awareness among local academics of the need to conceptualize IR theories with Chinese characteristics. This awareness stems from several factors: (i) the excessive dominance of Western models in explaining international politics and the necessity to build an IR theory that better captures China’s role, (ii) the need to revive classical Chinese political thought to interpret contemporary issues, and (iii) China’s political and economic rise, which demands innovative theoretical thinking to address this ascent. Consequently, we examine three prominent Chinese theoretical approaches—Zhao Tingyang’s Tianxia Theory, Yan Xuetong’s Moral Realism, and Qin Yaqing’s Relational Theory. To explore these points, we trace the trajectory of political thought in International Relations in China from the 1950s to the present day, focusing on the major intellectual movements that have shaped the complex academic landscape of Chinese IR theory and the current challenges in establishing a genuine Chinese School of IR.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5752/p.2317-773x.2024v12n2p48-65
Primary Topic
International Relations and Foreign Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Construction of International Relations (IR) Theories in China

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
International Relations and Foreign Policy
article

The Construction of International Relations (IR) Theories in China

article en

Abstract

This paper reviews the debates among Chinese scholars regarding the development of Chinese International Relations (IR) theory. We demonstrate that these debates, which began in the 1980s, reflect an increasing awareness among local academics of the need to conceptualize IR theories with Chinese characteristics. This awareness stems from several factors: (i) the excessive dominance of Western models in explaining international politics and the necessity to build an IR theory that better captures China’s role, (ii) the need to revive classical Chinese political thought to interpret contemporary issues, and (iii) China’s political and economic rise, which demands innovative theoretical thinking to address this ascent. Consequently, we examine three prominent Chinese theoretical approaches—Zhao Tingyang’s Tianxia Theory, Yan Xuetong’s Moral Realism, and Qin Yaqing’s Relational Theory. To explore these points, we trace the trajectory of political thought in International Relations in China from the 1950s to the present day, focusing on the major intellectual movements that have shaped the complex academic landscape of Chinese IR theory and the current challenges in establishing a genuine Chinese School of IR.

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Universidade de São Paulo (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
International Relations and Foreign Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Construction of International Relations (IR) Theories in China · SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS