Tristia: О фальсификатах рукописей Осипа Мандельштама и их восприятии в научном мире

This article addresses pressing issues in the textual criticism of early twentieth century Russian literature, focusing on a case study conducted at the V. V. Vinogradov Institute of the Russian Language, Russian Academy of Sciences. The study examines two newly acquired manuscripts, the authenticity of which was initially confirmed by a leading specialist in Mandelstam’s works and a forensic expert. However, through detailed philological and source-study methods, significant discrepancies between the language of these manuscripts and authentic works by Osip Mandelstam were identified, suggesting that these documents are not part of the standard corpus of the poet’s legacy. Consequently, the research concludes that the manuscripts are indeed counterfeits. This step-by-step analysis highlights the most relevant methods for verifying epistolary sources and underscores the necessity for qualified textual and source-critical expertise in handling autographs of Russian writers from the Silver Age.

Publication Details

Journal
Universitätsbibliothek der LMU
Published
2024-11-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5282/zgb77m82
Primary Topic
European Linguistics and Anthropology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Tristia: О фальсификатах рукописей Осипа Мандельштама и их восприятии в научном мире

Universitätsbibliothek der LMU
European Linguistics and Anthropology
article

Tristia: О фальсификатах рукописей Осипа Мандельштама и их восприятии в научном мире

article en

Abstract

This article addresses pressing issues in the textual criticism of early twentieth century Russian literature, focusing on a case study conducted at the V. V. Vinogradov Institute of the Russian Language, Russian Academy of Sciences. The study examines two newly acquired manuscripts, the authenticity of which was initially confirmed by a leading specialist in Mandelstam’s works and a forensic expert. However, through detailed philological and source-study methods, significant discrepancies between the language of these manuscripts and authentic works by Osip Mandelstam were identified, suggesting that these documents are not part of the standard corpus of the poet’s legacy. Consequently, the research concludes that the manuscripts are indeed counterfeits. This step-by-step analysis highlights the most relevant methods for verifying epistolary sources and underscores the necessity for qualified textual and source-critical expertise in handling autographs of Russian writers from the Silver Age.

Universitätsbibliothek der LMU
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
European Linguistics and Anthropology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.