A Comparative Study of Efficacy and Safety of Intralesional Injections of Vitamin D3, MMR Vaccine and Acyclovir in Management of Cutaneous Warts

Abstract Cutaneous warts, caused by human papillomavirus, are common benign skin lesions with various treatment options, including immunotherapy, which has gained attention for its ability to stimulate cell-mediated immunity and promote wart clearance. This study compared the efficacy and safety of intralesional injections of Vitamin D3, MMR vaccine, and acyclovir in the management of verruca vulgaris. A total of 105 patients were divided into three groups, each receiving intralesional injections of one of the treatments at two-week intervals, with a maximum of three sessions. The results showed that while initial improvements after the first session were comparable across all groups, significant differences emerged after the final session. The MMR group demonstrated superior efficacy, with 57.14% of patients achieving excellent improvement, com- pared to 28.57% in the Vitamin D3 group and 42.85% in the acyclovir group (p=0.00105). Additionally, the MMR group had the lowest proportion of patients with no improvement (11.42%), compared to the Vitamin D3 group (20%) and the acyclovir group (57.1%) (p=0.0045). Safety profiles also favored the MMR vaccine, which showed fewer adverse effects compared to Vitamin D3 and acyclovir. The findings suggest that intralesional MMR is a more effective and safer treatment option for cutaneous warts than intralesional Vitamin D3 or acyclovir. This supports the growing evidence for immunotherapy as a promising approach in managing cutaneous warts.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16737809
Primary Topic
Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comparative Study of Efficacy and Safety of Intralesional Injections of Vitamin D3, MMR Vaccine and Acyclovir in Management of Cutaneous Warts

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
article

A Comparative Study of Efficacy and Safety of Intralesional Injections of Vitamin D3, MMR Vaccine and Acyclovir in Management of Cutaneous Warts

article en

Abstract

Abstract Cutaneous warts, caused by human papillomavirus, are common benign skin lesions with various treatment options, including immunotherapy, which has gained attention for its ability to stimulate cell-mediated immunity and promote wart clearance. This study compared the efficacy and safety of intralesional injections of Vitamin D3, MMR vaccine, and acyclovir in the management of verruca vulgaris. A total of 105 patients were divided into three groups, each receiving intralesional injections of one of the treatments at two-week intervals, with a maximum of three sessions. The results showed that while initial improvements after the first session were comparable across all groups, significant differences emerged after the final session. The MMR group demonstrated superior efficacy, with 57.14% of patients achieving excellent improvement, com- pared to 28.57% in the Vitamin D3 group and 42.85% in the acyclovir group (p=0.00105). Additionally, the MMR group had the lowest proportion of patients with no improvement (11.42%), compared to the Vitamin D3 group (20%) and the acyclovir group (57.1%) (p=0.0045). Safety profiles also favored the MMR vaccine, which showed fewer adverse effects compared to Vitamin D3 and acyclovir. The findings suggest that intralesional MMR is a more effective and safer treatment option for cutaneous warts than intralesional Vitamin D3 or acyclovir. This supports the growing evidence for immunotherapy as a promising approach in managing cutaneous warts.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Advanced Pharma (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 46%
Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.