Edtech brokers and evidence governance: knowledge intermediaries in the education technology market

New types of intermediary organisations are creating evidence to guideschool practices and shape markets around education technologies.This article focuses on the practices through which edtech brokers –understood here as evidence-making organisations that mediatebetween the edtech industry, schools, policy and research centres –create edtech knowledge and evidence. When inserted into policy andpractice through recommendation systems, platform reviews, rankingsand badges, this knowledge has the potential to affect educationalpractices, policy implementation and investors’ decision-makingprocesses. Based on interviews and documentary sources, we identifythree practices through which edtech brokers produce and circulateedtech evidence: (i) participatory processes of evidence-making; (ii)political navigations and (iii) market curation. Ultimately, edtech brokersgovern, within and beyond their local contexts, what kinds of edtechevidence is produced and circulated. This evidence is intended to createnovel types of consensus between industry, academia, government andschools, redefining the boundaries of public education and the privateedtech sector in an increasingly digital age.

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2024-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16759309
Primary Topic
Global Educational Policies and Reforms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Edtech brokers and evidence governance: knowledge intermediaries in the education technology market

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Global Educational Policies and Reforms
article

Edtech brokers and evidence governance: knowledge intermediaries in the education technology market

article en

Abstract

New types of intermediary organisations are creating evidence to guideschool practices and shape markets around education technologies.This article focuses on the practices through which edtech brokers –understood here as evidence-making organisations that mediatebetween the edtech industry, schools, policy and research centres –create edtech knowledge and evidence. When inserted into policy andpractice through recommendation systems, platform reviews, rankingsand badges, this knowledge has the potential to affect educationalpractices, policy implementation and investors’ decision-makingprocesses. Based on interviews and documentary sources, we identifythree practices through which edtech brokers produce and circulateedtech evidence: (i) participatory processes of evidence-making; (ii)political navigations and (iii) market curation. Ultimately, edtech brokersgovern, within and beyond their local contexts, what kinds of edtechevidence is produced and circulated. This evidence is intended to createnovel types of consensus between industry, academia, government andschools, redefining the boundaries of public education and the privateedtech sector in an increasingly digital age.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Global Educational Policies and Reforms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.