Probable Stabilization Theory - A Valence Inspired Controller for Efficient Hallucination Mitigation in LLMs

This study introduces a risk-gated anchored prompting strategy — a valence-inspired controller that dynamically decides when and how strongly to ground a large language model (LLM) with retrieved context (“anchors”). We map the anchor-budget vs. hallucination curve and show it follows a reproducible U-shape: too-weak anchoring leads to high entropy (hallucinations), while too-strong anchoring reduces adaptability. The proposed controller uses prompt features, self-uncertainty signals, and retrieval priors to select light or heavy anchoring only when needed. Across TriviaQA, NaturalQuestions, HotpotQA, and a curated Quotes/Stats micro-suite, the method reduces token usage by ≥30% compared to always-anchoring, while maintaining or improving factual accuracy and calibration. The work contributes to both practical AI deployment and the theoretical framing of cognitive stabilization loops. Pre-registered claims: Efficiency: Match/exceed always-anchored accuracy with ≥30% token savings. Mechanics: U-shaped hallucination–anchor curve with stable optimum. Calibration: Improved Expected Calibration Error (ECE) and selective answering AUROC ≥0.80. Generalization: Results hold across model families and datasets. PST ContextThis experiment operationalizes concepts from Probable Stabilization Theory (PST) — a unifying framework describing thought as an iterative loop of entropy injection, stabilizer engagement, and anchor formation. In this AI setting, valence (risk) acts as a routing signal, triggering evidence retrieval (entropy injection) only when necessary, followed by anchored generation (stabilization) and caching for faster future recall (anchor formation). While the main results stand independently for AI reliability research, they also serve as a cross-domain test of PST’s scalability from human cognition to synthetic reasoning systems. **Keywords:** Probable Stabilization Theory, cognitive stabilization, entropy and cognition, anchors and stabilizers, collapse and re-anchoring, cognitive loop model, large language models, hallucination mitigation, retrieval-augmented generation, anchoring in AI, adaptive prompting, valence-based control, experimental design, cross-domain theory, loop-based cognition, information anchoring

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-08-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16792283
Primary Topic
Mental Health via Writing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Probable Stabilization Theory - A Valence Inspired Controller for Efficient Hallucination Mitigation in LLMs

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Mental Health via Writing
article

Probable Stabilization Theory - A Valence Inspired Controller for Efficient Hallucination Mitigation in LLMs

article en

Abstract

This study introduces a risk-gated anchored prompting strategy — a valence-inspired controller that dynamically decides when and how strongly to ground a large language model (LLM) with retrieved context (“anchors”). We map the anchor-budget vs. hallucination curve and show it follows a reproducible U-shape: too-weak anchoring leads to high entropy (hallucinations), while too-strong anchoring reduces adaptability. The proposed controller uses prompt features, self-uncertainty signals, and retrieval priors to select light or heavy anchoring only when needed. Across TriviaQA, NaturalQuestions, HotpotQA, and a curated Quotes/Stats micro-suite, the method reduces token usage by ≥30% compared to always-anchoring, while maintaining or improving factual accuracy and calibration. The work contributes to both practical AI deployment and the theoretical framing of cognitive stabilization loops. Pre-registered claims: Efficiency: Match/exceed always-anchored accuracy with ≥30% token savings. Mechanics: U-shaped hallucination–anchor curve with stable optimum. Calibration: Improved Expected Calibration Error (ECE) and selective answering AUROC ≥0.80. Generalization: Results hold across model families and datasets. PST ContextThis experiment operationalizes concepts from Probable Stabilization Theory (PST) — a unifying framework describing thought as an iterative loop of entropy injection, stabilizer engagement, and anchor formation. In this AI setting, valence (risk) acts as a routing signal, triggering evidence retrieval (entropy injection) only when necessary, followed by anchored generation (stabilization) and caching for faster future recall (anchor formation). While the main results stand independently for AI reliability research, they also serve as a cross-domain test of PST’s scalability from human cognition to synthetic reasoning systems. **Keywords:** Probable Stabilization Theory, cognitive stabilization, entropy and cognition, anchors and stabilizers, collapse and re-anchoring, cognitive loop model, large language models, hallucination mitigation, retrieval-augmented generation, anchoring in AI, adaptive prompting, valence-based control, experimental design, cross-domain theory, loop-based cognition, information anchoring

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Mental Health via Writing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.