Design Performance Measurement of Intelligent Garbage Sorting Cart using Neutrosophic Sets and SuperHyperSoft

With the rapid increase in urban waste generation, efficient and automated waste sorting solutions have become essential for sustainable waste management. This study evaluates the gent Garbage Sorting Cart under the decision-making methodology. We use the Quadripartitioned Single-Valued Neutrosophic Z-Numbers (QSVNZN) with four membership functions to dela with the uncertainty information. Two methods are used in this study, such as the CRITIC method to compute the criteria weights and the ARAS method to rank the alternatives. The decision-making process is used with the SuperHyperSoft set to deal with different criteria and alternatives. We used eight criteria and six alternatives. We proposed six collections of SuperHyperSoft. In each collection, we applied the ARAS methodology and ranked the alternatives. The results show stability in the ranks.

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2025-03-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14969528
Primary Topic
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Design Performance Measurement of Intelligent Garbage Sorting Cart using Neutrosophic Sets and SuperHyperSoft

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
article

Design Performance Measurement of Intelligent Garbage Sorting Cart using Neutrosophic Sets and SuperHyperSoft

article en

Abstract

With the rapid increase in urban waste generation, efficient and automated waste sorting solutions have become essential for sustainable waste management. This study evaluates the gent Garbage Sorting Cart under the decision-making methodology. We use the Quadripartitioned Single-Valued Neutrosophic Z-Numbers (QSVNZN) with four membership functions to dela with the uncertainty information. Two methods are used in this study, such as the CRITIC method to compute the criteria weights and the ARAS method to rank the alternatives. The decision-making process is used with the SuperHyperSoft set to deal with different criteria and alternatives. We used eight criteria and six alternatives. We proposed six collections of SuperHyperSoft. In each collection, we applied the ARAS methodology and ranked the alternatives. The results show stability in the ranks.

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.