Deliverable 2.11: Federated infrastructure design

Deliverable 2.11 on “Federated Infrastructure Design” presents the results from M1 to M18 of Task 2.6, which will continue until M42. In this deliverable, we report the design of the Federated Learning (FL) infrastructure and the tests we conducted. The current federated infrastructure is: secure thanks to the encrypted communication via gRPC/TLS and secure aggregation (SecAgg/SecAgg+); flexible, because it supports horizontal (same data types) and vertical (different data modalities) FL workflows, including embedding-based vertical FL; and, deployable, because we containerised via Docker and reproducible across HPC (Slurm), cloud (Azure), and manual setups. These features were validated and refined through two project workshops: Workshop 3 (Jan 30 & 31 2025), which focused on horizontal FL with XGBoost and CNNs across local, cloud, and multi-site environments. Workshop 4 (May 19 2025), which focused on vertical FL across three distributed data sources (i.e., SURF, UNIPD, and UNITO) using split ALS data modalities. We have identified a minimal participant configuration that allows access to a server provisioned with 16 vCPUs and 32 GB of RAM; clients can optionally leverage GPUs. In terms of scaling and monitoring, we are using Flower Next with persistent servers, CLI, and Messaging API; basic logging is implemented, and we plan to integrate MLflow/W&B. From a privacy and security perspective our approach combines TLS and SecAgg and we are planning upgrades to Differential Privacy (DP), Trusted Execution Environments (TEEs), and defenses against poisoning. Additionally, we tested our data approach on the BrainLat dataset (MRI + EEG), though limited by low matched-patient count and data errors, the embedding architecture remains adaptable. This deliverable verifies Milestone 6, “Data management infrastructure”, by testing the Federated Data Management Infrastructure on use-cases 1 and 2, including data and involved partners.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15847728
Primary Topic
Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Deliverable 2.11: Federated infrastructure design

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
article

Deliverable 2.11: Federated infrastructure design

article en

Abstract

Deliverable 2.11 on “Federated Infrastructure Design” presents the results from M1 to M18 of Task 2.6, which will continue until M42. In this deliverable, we report the design of the Federated Learning (FL) infrastructure and the tests we conducted. The current federated infrastructure is: secure thanks to the encrypted communication via gRPC/TLS and secure aggregation (SecAgg/SecAgg+); flexible, because it supports horizontal (same data types) and vertical (different data modalities) FL workflows, including embedding-based vertical FL; and, deployable, because we containerised via Docker and reproducible across HPC (Slurm), cloud (Azure), and manual setups. These features were validated and refined through two project workshops: Workshop 3 (Jan 30 & 31 2025), which focused on horizontal FL with XGBoost and CNNs across local, cloud, and multi-site environments. Workshop 4 (May 19 2025), which focused on vertical FL across three distributed data sources (i.e., SURF, UNIPD, and UNITO) using split ALS data modalities. We have identified a minimal participant configuration that allows access to a server provisioned with 16 vCPUs and 32 GB of RAM; clients can optionally leverage GPUs. In terms of scaling and monitoring, we are using Flower Next with persistent servers, CLI, and Messaging API; basic logging is implemented, and we plan to integrate MLflow/W&B. From a privacy and security perspective our approach combines TLS and SecAgg and we are planning upgrades to Differential Privacy (DP), Trusted Execution Environments (TEEs), and defenses against poisoning. Additionally, we tested our data approach on the BrainLat dataset (MRI + EEG), though limited by low matched-patient count and data errors, the embedding architecture remains adaptable. This deliverable verifies Milestone 6, “Data management infrastructure”, by testing the Federated Data Management Infrastructure on use-cases 1 and 2, including data and involved partners.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
University of Padua (IT), Aalborg University (DK)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Deliverable 2.11: Federated infrastructure design · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS