Humanoid Interrogation in High-End Terrorism Cases: Innovations, Challenges, and Legal Admissibility

This study examines the integration of humanoids based on artificial intelligence (AI) in high-end terrorism interrogations, focusing on their potential to enhance accuracy while mitigating human biases. Employing a mixed-methods approach, it analyzes legal frameworks, ethical considerations, and AI performance in simulated interrogations. Findings indicate while AI improves data processing, it presents ethical challenges, including privacy concerns and algorithmic biases. Legal quibbles regarding accountability and evidence admissibility necessitate regulatory updates. The study concludes that AI-assisted interrogations require comprehensive legal frameworks, stringent human oversight, and adherence to human rights standards to ensure ethical and legally sound applications in counter-terrorism policies.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15210148
Primary Topic
Torture, Ethics, and Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Humanoid Interrogation in High-End Terrorism Cases: Innovations, Challenges, and Legal Admissibility

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Torture, Ethics, and Law
article

Humanoid Interrogation in High-End Terrorism Cases: Innovations, Challenges, and Legal Admissibility

article en

Abstract

This study examines the integration of humanoids based on artificial intelligence (AI) in high-end terrorism interrogations, focusing on their potential to enhance accuracy while mitigating human biases. Employing a mixed-methods approach, it analyzes legal frameworks, ethical considerations, and AI performance in simulated interrogations. Findings indicate while AI improves data processing, it presents ethical challenges, including privacy concerns and algorithmic biases. Legal quibbles regarding accountability and evidence admissibility necessitate regulatory updates. The study concludes that AI-assisted interrogations require comprehensive legal frameworks, stringent human oversight, and adherence to human rights standards to ensure ethical and legally sound applications in counter-terrorism policies.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
University of the Punjab (PK), Forman Christian College (PK)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Torture, Ethics, and Law
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.