Co-Adaptive Velocity and Position Control of 3-DoFs Prosthesis via Incremental Learning

Upper-limb prosthesis control remains challenging in achieving natural and intuitive movements, especially for devices with multiple actuated degrees of freedom (DoFs), often demanding high cognitive effort. Machine learning aids in mapping phantom limb muscle patterns to prosthetic movements, but is limited by the instability of electromyographic signals over time. This study investigates two simultaneous and proportional myocontrol strategies, based on position and velocity, using incremental learning for a 3-DoFs prosthesis, allowing co-adaptation between the system and the user. Six able-bodied and five limb-difference participants performed Target Achievement Control tests over four sessions per control strategy, assessing performance, usability, workload, simultaneity, and proportionality. Results indicate that velocity control consistently outperforms position control in both populations, yielding lower errors, higher success rates and path efficiency, and lower workload. Notably, both control strategies showed significant improvement over time in the able-bodied group, while only position

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-01-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15094348
Primary Topic
Muscle activation and electromyography studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Co-Adaptive Velocity and Position Control of 3-DoFs Prosthesis via Incremental Learning

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Muscle activation and electromyography studies
article

Co-Adaptive Velocity and Position Control of 3-DoFs Prosthesis via Incremental Learning

article en

Abstract

Upper-limb prosthesis control remains challenging in achieving natural and intuitive movements, especially for devices with multiple actuated degrees of freedom (DoFs), often demanding high cognitive effort. Machine learning aids in mapping phantom limb muscle patterns to prosthetic movements, but is limited by the instability of electromyographic signals over time. This study investigates two simultaneous and proportional myocontrol strategies, based on position and velocity, using incremental learning for a 3-DoFs prosthesis, allowing co-adaptation between the system and the user. Six able-bodied and five limb-difference participants performed Target Achievement Control tests over four sessions per control strategy, assessing performance, usability, workload, simultaneity, and proportionality. Results indicate that velocity control consistently outperforms position control in both populations, yielding lower errors, higher success rates and path efficiency, and lower workload. Notably, both control strategies showed significant improvement over time in the able-bodied group, while only position

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Politecnico di Torino (IT), Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (DE), Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e. V. (DLR) (DE), Italian Institute of Technology (IT), Robotics Research (United States) (US), Istituto Nazionale per l'Assicurazione Contro gli Infortuni sul Lavoro (IT), Turin Polytechnic University (UZ)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 100%
Muscle activation and electromyography studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Co-Adaptive Velocity and Position Control of 3-DoFs Prosthesis via Incremental Learning · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS