Comparative Phytochemical Analysis Of Tridax Procumbens L. And Calotropis Gigantea(L.) R. Br. Ex Schult

Abstract: Traditional medicine has commonly regarded medicinal plants like Tridax procumbens L. and Calotropis gigantea (L.) but there are relatively few cautious phytochemical assessments of their primary and secondary constituents. The justification for this study is to take a gander at the phytochemical design of these two plants, with a complement on phenolic compounds, protein, ascorbic destructive, and chlorophyll in the different plant sections (leaf, stem, and root). Primary metabolite levels were assessed quantitatively, and the results showed noteworthy assortment in ascorbic destructive, protein, and chlorophyll levels. The leaves of Tridax procumbens had a fairly higher intermingling of chlorophyll (12.33 mg/100g dry weight) than those of Calotropis gigantea (11.98 mg/100g dry weight), whereas chlorophyll totally absent in root. The protein, an essential biomolecule, was compare in the two plants with the greatest obsessions occurring in the leaves. The leaves of Calotropis gigantea (54.60 mg/100g dry weight) and Tridax procumbens (56.81 mg/100g dry weight) have the most vital gathering of ascorbic destructive, a critical malignant growth counteraction specialist part. The phenolic content in C. gigantea was highest in the leaf extract (350.12 mg GAE/100g d.w.), moderate in the stem (128.56 mg GAE/100g d.w.), and lowest in the root (102.23 mg GAE/100g d.w.). In T. procumbens, the phenolic content in the leaf was 119.26 mg GAE/100g d.w., followed by the stem (102.63 mg GAE/100g d.w.), but not detected in the root.

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-05-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15421316
Primary Topic
Phytochemistry and Bioactive Compounds
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Phytochemical Analysis Of Tridax Procumbens L. And Calotropis Gigantea(L.) R. Br. Ex Schult

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Phytochemistry and Bioactive Compounds
article

Comparative Phytochemical Analysis Of Tridax Procumbens L. And Calotropis Gigantea(L.) R. Br. Ex Schult

article en

Abstract

Abstract: Traditional medicine has commonly regarded medicinal plants like Tridax procumbens L. and Calotropis gigantea (L.) but there are relatively few cautious phytochemical assessments of their primary and secondary constituents. The justification for this study is to take a gander at the phytochemical design of these two plants, with a complement on phenolic compounds, protein, ascorbic destructive, and chlorophyll in the different plant sections (leaf, stem, and root). Primary metabolite levels were assessed quantitatively, and the results showed noteworthy assortment in ascorbic destructive, protein, and chlorophyll levels. The leaves of Tridax procumbens had a fairly higher intermingling of chlorophyll (12.33 mg/100g dry weight) than those of Calotropis gigantea (11.98 mg/100g dry weight), whereas chlorophyll totally absent in root. The protein, an essential biomolecule, was compare in the two plants with the greatest obsessions occurring in the leaves. The leaves of Calotropis gigantea (54.60 mg/100g dry weight) and Tridax procumbens (56.81 mg/100g dry weight) have the most vital gathering of ascorbic destructive, a critical malignant growth counteraction specialist part. The phenolic content in C. gigantea was highest in the leaf extract (350.12 mg GAE/100g d.w.), moderate in the stem (128.56 mg GAE/100g d.w.), and lowest in the root (102.23 mg GAE/100g d.w.). In T. procumbens, the phenolic content in the leaf was 119.26 mg GAE/100g d.w., followed by the stem (102.63 mg GAE/100g d.w.), but not detected in the root.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Phytochemistry and Bioactive Compounds
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparative Phytochemical Analysis Of Tridax Procumbens L. And Calotropis Gigantea(L.) R. Br. Ex Schult · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS