REGULATORY FRAMEWORKS FOR DECENTRALIZED CLINICAL TRIALS: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF FDA AND EMA GUIDELINES

Decentralized clinical trials (DCTs) have taken the landscape of clinical research significantly further by exploiting digital technologies, remote monitoring, and telemedicine for patient involvement and data-pulling. However, the governing regulatory frameworks that exist for DCTs vary from region to region, with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency establishing different sets of guidelines to ensure patient safety, data integrity, and compliance. This review serves to provide a comparative analysis of the regulations set by the FDA and EMA when it comes to DCTs in the following subject areas: remote patient monitoring, eConsent, data protection (HIPAA vs. GDPR), and the artificial intelligence role in overseeing the trial activity. Significant differences, therefore, would also include regulatory flexibility, ethics committee involvement, and data security requirements.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-04-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15274465
Primary Topic
Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

REGULATORY FRAMEWORKS FOR DECENTRALIZED CLINICAL TRIALS: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF FDA AND EMA GUIDELINES

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
article

REGULATORY FRAMEWORKS FOR DECENTRALIZED CLINICAL TRIALS: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF FDA AND EMA GUIDELINES

article en

Abstract

Decentralized clinical trials (DCTs) have taken the landscape of clinical research significantly further by exploiting digital technologies, remote monitoring, and telemedicine for patient involvement and data-pulling. However, the governing regulatory frameworks that exist for DCTs vary from region to region, with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency establishing different sets of guidelines to ensure patient safety, data integrity, and compliance. This review serves to provide a comparative analysis of the regulations set by the FDA and EMA when it comes to DCTs in the following subject areas: remote patient monitoring, eConsent, data protection (HIPAA vs. GDPR), and the artificial intelligence role in overseeing the trial activity. Significant differences, therefore, would also include regulatory flexibility, ethics committee involvement, and data security requirements.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Northeastern University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

REGULATORY FRAMEWORKS FOR DECENTRALIZED CLINICAL TRIALS: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF FDA AND EMA GUIDELINES · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS