NET4Age-Friendly - Evaluation and Business Models on SHAFE

This document offers a suite of evaluation instruments and insights into the business models for advancing the SHAFE implementation and the development of Smart Healthy Age-Friendly Environments (SHAFE) ecosystems. The purpose of this deliverable is to provide a way of understanding that innovation is to be embedded also in the evaluation and business models in order to advance technological innovation, the change needed in the health and care systems and in the age of urban environments. There is evidence of significant progress having been made in creating a functioning and successful SHAFE environment. However, this growth is limited by legislative complexities, country differences, and not having a set of toolboxes for conducting proper evaluations of the country/regional SHAFE ecosystems, innovation programs and impacts. Removing the limiting factors would increase the attractiveness of SHAFE for decision makers, thus creating a more resilient milieu for SHAFE promotion. The study opens with three key areas of instruments necessary to develop the sustainability of SHAFE: a) For evaluating the SHAFE ecosystem implementation b) For evaluating the effectiveness of the innovative programs c) For Social, Economic and Environmental impacts of SHAFE. Business Models in SHAFE for integrated health and care and for the new assistive technologies are presented. The conclusions section refers to business models and policy and funding recommendations that are relevant for offering the sustainability of the SHAFE ecosystems.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2024-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14288501
Primary Topic
Healthcare Facilities Design and Sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

NET4Age-Friendly - Evaluation and Business Models on SHAFE

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Healthcare Facilities Design and Sustainability
article

NET4Age-Friendly - Evaluation and Business Models on SHAFE

article en

Abstract

This document offers a suite of evaluation instruments and insights into the business models for advancing the SHAFE implementation and the development of Smart Healthy Age-Friendly Environments (SHAFE) ecosystems. The purpose of this deliverable is to provide a way of understanding that innovation is to be embedded also in the evaluation and business models in order to advance technological innovation, the change needed in the health and care systems and in the age of urban environments. There is evidence of significant progress having been made in creating a functioning and successful SHAFE environment. However, this growth is limited by legislative complexities, country differences, and not having a set of toolboxes for conducting proper evaluations of the country/regional SHAFE ecosystems, innovation programs and impacts. Removing the limiting factors would increase the attractiveness of SHAFE for decision makers, thus creating a more resilient milieu for SHAFE promotion. The study opens with three key areas of instruments necessary to develop the sustainability of SHAFE: a) For evaluating the SHAFE ecosystem implementation b) For evaluating the effectiveness of the innovative programs c) For Social, Economic and Environmental impacts of SHAFE. Business Models in SHAFE for integrated health and care and for the new assistive technologies are presented. The conclusions section refers to business models and policy and funding recommendations that are relevant for offering the sustainability of the SHAFE ecosystems.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Friends United (US), Share and Care Foundation (US), Shine Micro (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Healthcare Facilities Design and Sustainability
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.