Beyond Compliance: Generative AI Safety Evaluation for Civil Society

This archive contains the presentation materials for “Beyond Compliance: Generative AI Safety Evaluation for Civil Society,” delivered by Ashley Khor at the IHS Summer Graduate Conference on May 31, 2025. The talk introduces a hybrid evaluation framework designed specifically for high-impact, community-driven AI use cases. Developed through both academic review and field practice, the framework incorporates five core dimensions of safety: Technical and content integrity Relational and ethical grounding (design justice, feminist, and trauma-informed principles) Usability and accessibility Organizational readiness Contextual appropriateness for sensitive, user-directed interactions. In addition to defining these dimensions, the project extends current GenAI safety practices through a participatory methodology that includes five test-a-thon methods: human-in-the-loop scoring, participatory red teaming, simulated user journeys, reflective feedback circles, and observer-based shadow scoring. Together, these methods offer a survivor-centered and emotionally attuned lens for evaluating AI systems — not only by their outputs, but by how they are experienced, trusted, and used.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-05-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15570676
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Beyond Compliance: Generative AI Safety Evaluation for Civil Society

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Beyond Compliance: Generative AI Safety Evaluation for Civil Society

article en

Abstract

This archive contains the presentation materials for “Beyond Compliance: Generative AI Safety Evaluation for Civil Society,” delivered by Ashley Khor at the IHS Summer Graduate Conference on May 31, 2025. The talk introduces a hybrid evaluation framework designed specifically for high-impact, community-driven AI use cases. Developed through both academic review and field practice, the framework incorporates five core dimensions of safety: Technical and content integrity Relational and ethical grounding (design justice, feminist, and trauma-informed principles) Usability and accessibility Organizational readiness Contextual appropriateness for sensitive, user-directed interactions. In addition to defining these dimensions, the project extends current GenAI safety practices through a participatory methodology that includes five test-a-thon methods: human-in-the-loop scoring, participatory red teaming, simulated user journeys, reflective feedback circles, and observer-based shadow scoring. Together, these methods offer a survivor-centered and emotionally attuned lens for evaluating AI systems — not only by their outputs, but by how they are experienced, trusted, and used.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
University of Pittsburgh (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Beyond Compliance: Generative AI Safety Evaluation for Civil Society · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS