Appropriate Uses of AI for Qualitative Analysis

The rise of Generative-AI has resulted in heated debate in the qualitative research community, with some heralding this new era with enthusiasm whilst others look at what’s occurring with horror. Whether you’re an advocate or a sceptic, come along to discuss the issues and consider whether and how it might be appropriate to integrate AI tools into the qualitative analysis workflow. This session begins by mapping the landscape; providing some historical context and outlining the three core genres AI tools in the qualitative data analysis (QDA) space: the use of general-purpose chatbot tools (such as ChatGPT and similar), a plethora of new Apps harnessing Gen-AI functionality, and the integration of Gen-AI features into established qualitative software platforms. We then focus in on how Gen-AI integrations can be used in methodologically appropriate ways to assist QDA in different contexts. Current options are outlined, demonstrated and discussed: AI Summaries, AI Code Suggestions / Coding, and AI Chatting. We then consider how and when these tools can be used appropriately and in combination with human interpretation at different stages of the analytic workflow. This includes ethical issues including model development, informed consent, and authorship, and methodological implications such as interpretive capabilities, the changing role of digital tools and collaborative analysis. This session is part of the 2025 IASSIST QDA Workshop Series, a year-long series exploring tools and technologies for qualitative data analysis (QDA).

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-03-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15085973
Primary Topic
Qualitative Research Methods and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Appropriate Uses of AI for Qualitative Analysis

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Qualitative Research Methods and Applications
article

Appropriate Uses of AI for Qualitative Analysis

article en

Abstract

The rise of Generative-AI has resulted in heated debate in the qualitative research community, with some heralding this new era with enthusiasm whilst others look at what’s occurring with horror. Whether you’re an advocate or a sceptic, come along to discuss the issues and consider whether and how it might be appropriate to integrate AI tools into the qualitative analysis workflow. This session begins by mapping the landscape; providing some historical context and outlining the three core genres AI tools in the qualitative data analysis (QDA) space: the use of general-purpose chatbot tools (such as ChatGPT and similar), a plethora of new Apps harnessing Gen-AI functionality, and the integration of Gen-AI features into established qualitative software platforms. We then focus in on how Gen-AI integrations can be used in methodologically appropriate ways to assist QDA in different contexts. Current options are outlined, demonstrated and discussed: AI Summaries, AI Code Suggestions / Coding, and AI Chatting. We then consider how and when these tools can be used appropriately and in combination with human interpretation at different stages of the analytic workflow. This includes ethical issues including model development, informed consent, and authorship, and methodological implications such as interpretive capabilities, the changing role of digital tools and collaborative analysis. This session is part of the 2025 IASSIST QDA Workshop Series, a year-long series exploring tools and technologies for qualitative data analysis (QDA).

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
University of Surrey (GB), Qualitative Data Repository (US)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Qualitative Research Methods and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.