Curiosity-Driven AI for Drug Discovery: Integrating Intrinsic Motivation and Reflective Reasoning for Safe Molecular Innovation

The escalating cost and lengthy timelines of drug development—often costing billions of dollars and taking decades per approved drug—pose severe bottlenecks in addressing unmet medical needs. Conventional RL agents that maximize reward often generate promising molecular candidates that eventually fail essential safety checks, resulting in toxic or impractical compounds. Inspired by dual-process cognitive theory (Kahneman, 2011), our framework mirrors human decision-making by integrating: • System 1 (Intrinsic Curiosity): Drives rapid exploration by rewarding unexpected outcomes (Schmidhuber, 2010; Pathak et al., 2017). • System 2 (Reflective Reasoning): Preemptively validates candidate actions using rule-based constraints (e.g., Lipinski’s Rules, PAINS filters) combined with data-driven safety predictions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-02-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14907499
Primary Topic
Psychological and Educational Research Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Curiosity-Driven AI for Drug Discovery: Integrating Intrinsic Motivation and Reflective Reasoning for Safe Molecular Innovation

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Psychological and Educational Research Studies
article

Curiosity-Driven AI for Drug Discovery: Integrating Intrinsic Motivation and Reflective Reasoning for Safe Molecular Innovation

article en

Abstract

The escalating cost and lengthy timelines of drug development—often costing billions of dollars and taking decades per approved drug—pose severe bottlenecks in addressing unmet medical needs. Conventional RL agents that maximize reward often generate promising molecular candidates that eventually fail essential safety checks, resulting in toxic or impractical compounds. Inspired by dual-process cognitive theory (Kahneman, 2011), our framework mirrors human decision-making by integrating: • System 1 (Intrinsic Curiosity): Drives rapid exploration by rewarding unexpected outcomes (Schmidhuber, 2010; Pathak et al., 2017). • System 2 (Reflective Reasoning): Preemptively validates candidate actions using rule-based constraints (e.g., Lipinski’s Rules, PAINS filters) combined with data-driven safety predictions

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Psychological and Educational Research Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.