Harmonizing Aesthetics and Sustainability through the Evaluation of Environmental Art Design in Green Architecture using the Triangular UnderNorm

Environmental art design has emerged as a crucial element in enhancing the aesthetic and ecological value of green architecture. This study develops a multi-criteria evaluation framework to assess the effectiveness of environmental art design within sustainable architectural spaces. By integrating both visual and environmental aspects, this framework enables a comprehensive assessment based on six carefully selected criteria and ten alternative design projects. The research contributes to bridge the gap between artistic expression and ecological responsibility in modern architectural practices. We use the RAFSI methodology to rank alternatives. The average methodology is used to compute the criteria weights. This methodology is used under the Triangular UnderNorm to deal with interval values in the decision matrix. The case study is shown to show the validation of the proposed approach. The sensitivity analysis is provided to show the stability of the ranks.

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2025-04-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15265818
Primary Topic
Sustainable Building Design and Assessment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Harmonizing Aesthetics and Sustainability through the Evaluation of Environmental Art Design in Green Architecture using the Triangular UnderNorm

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Sustainable Building Design and Assessment
article

Harmonizing Aesthetics and Sustainability through the Evaluation of Environmental Art Design in Green Architecture using the Triangular UnderNorm

article en

Abstract

Environmental art design has emerged as a crucial element in enhancing the aesthetic and ecological value of green architecture. This study develops a multi-criteria evaluation framework to assess the effectiveness of environmental art design within sustainable architectural spaces. By integrating both visual and environmental aspects, this framework enables a comprehensive assessment based on six carefully selected criteria and ten alternative design projects. The research contributes to bridge the gap between artistic expression and ecological responsibility in modern architectural practices. We use the RAFSI methodology to rank alternatives. The average methodology is used to compute the criteria weights. This methodology is used under the Triangular UnderNorm to deal with interval values in the decision matrix. The case study is shown to show the validation of the proposed approach. The sensitivity analysis is provided to show the stability of the ranks.

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Sustainable Building Design and Assessment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.